Total Pageviews

Boston Symphony Announces New Season

The Boston Symphony Orchestra on Tuesday disclosed plans next season to tour China and Japan, perform Britten’s large-scale “War Requiem,” present Beethoven’s five piano concertos with Yefim Bronfman as soloist and put on a concert performance of “Salome” by Strauss - all without a music director. The orchestra released its programs for 2013-14, which will be the third season since James Levine stepped down as its music director for health reasons after already missing a number of concerts in previous years.

An array of guest conductors are filling in, including Lorin Maazel, who will lead the Asian tour, which marks the first time since 1979 that the Boston Symphony has gone to China â€" now a frequent destination for Western music ensembles. Guest conductors are often viewed with extra scrutiny when an orchestra is searching for a music director, although it is risky to consider them all candidates. Other guests next season include Andris Nelsons, who will lead “Salome,” Robert Spano, Ste’phane Dene`ve, Daniel Harding, Manfred Honeck, Christoph Eschenbach, Charles Dutoit, who will lead the Britten work, Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos, Bernard Haitink and Andrew Davis. Orchestra officials declined to comment on their search for a music director.



Boston Symphony Announces New Season

The Boston Symphony Orchestra on Tuesday disclosed plans next season to tour China and Japan, perform Britten’s large-scale “War Requiem,” present Beethoven’s five piano concertos with Yefim Bronfman as soloist and put on a concert performance of “Salome” by Strauss - all without a music director. The orchestra released its programs for 2013-14, which will be the third season since James Levine stepped down as its music director for health reasons after already missing a number of concerts in previous years.

An array of guest conductors are filling in, including Lorin Maazel, who will lead the Asian tour, which marks the first time since 1979 that the Boston Symphony has gone to China â€" now a frequent destination for Western music ensembles. Guest conductors are often viewed with extra scrutiny when an orchestra is searching for a music director, although it is risky to consider them all candidates. Other guests next season include Andris Nelsons, who will lead “Salome,” Robert Spano, Ste’phane Dene`ve, Daniel Harding, Manfred Honeck, Christoph Eschenbach, Charles Dutoit, who will lead the Britten work, Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos, Bernard Haitink and Andrew Davis. Orchestra officials declined to comment on their search for a music director.



Boston Symphony Announces New Season

The Boston Symphony Orchestra on Tuesday disclosed plans next season to tour China and Japan, perform Britten’s large-scale “War Requiem,” present Beethoven’s five piano concertos with Yefim Bronfman as soloist and put on a concert performance of “Salome” by Strauss - all without a music director. The orchestra released its programs for 2013-14, which will be the third season since James Levine stepped down as its music director for health reasons after already missing a number of concerts in previous years.

An array of guest conductors are filling in, including Lorin Maazel, who will lead the Asian tour, which marks the first time since 1979 that the Boston Symphony has gone to China â€" now a frequent destination for Western music ensembles. Guest conductors are often viewed with extra scrutiny when an orchestra is searching for a music director, although it is risky to consider them all candidates. Other guests next season include Andris Nelsons, who will lead “Salome,” Robert Spano, Ste’phane Dene`ve, Daniel Harding, Manfred Honeck, Christoph Eschenbach, Charles Dutoit, who will lead the Britten work, Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos, Bernard Haitink and Andrew Davis. Orchestra officials declined to comment on their search for a music director.



Boston Symphony Announces New Season

The Boston Symphony Orchestra on Tuesday disclosed plans next season to tour China and Japan, perform Britten’s large-scale “War Requiem,” present Beethoven’s five piano concertos with Yefim Bronfman as soloist and put on a concert performance of “Salome” by Strauss - all without a music director. The orchestra released its programs for 2013-14, which will be the third season since James Levine stepped down as its music director for health reasons after already missing a number of concerts in previous years.

An array of guest conductors are filling in, including Lorin Maazel, who will lead the Asian tour, which marks the first time since 1979 that the Boston Symphony has gone to China â€" now a frequent destination for Western music ensembles. Guest conductors are often viewed with extra scrutiny when an orchestra is searching for a music director, although it is risky to consider them all candidates. Other guests next season include Andris Nelsons, who will lead “Salome,” Robert Spano, Ste’phane Dene`ve, Daniel Harding, Manfred Honeck, Christoph Eschenbach, Charles Dutoit, who will lead the Britten work, Rafael Frühbeck de Burgos, Bernard Haitink and Andrew Davis. Orchestra officials declined to comment on their search for a music director.



At Mayoral Forum, a Focus on the Environment

As a sharp-tongued Republican in a liberal stronghold, John A. Catsimatidis, the billionaire owner of the Gristedes grocery chain, prides himself on being called a rebel. But he was unusually defiant, even by his standards, at a mayoral forum on environmental sustainability on Monday.

Were humans causing global warming? “Not sure,” he said. Were there too many people driving cars below 59th Street in Manhattan? No. Would he like to see more people commute by bicycle? Silence.

On those three questions, his opponents were unanimous in their judgment: Mr. Catsimatidis was wrong.

Mr. Catsimatidis, though, had a simple explanation. “I tell the truth,” he said.

Eight of his opponents at the forum â€" five Democrats, two Republicans and one Independence Party member â€" spoke more moderately, seemingly more in tune to the sensibilities of the audience of several hundred at Cooper Union, many of them environmental activists.

One candidate, Christine C. Quinn, the City Council speaker and a Democrat, was the only contender to express support for closing the Indian Point nuclear power plant, which supplies much of New York City’s electricity.

“We want to be moving toward cleaner, safer energy,” she said to cheers from those in attendance at the forum, which was sponsored by Cooper Union and the New York League of Conservation Voters. Ms. Quinn suggested pursuing geothermal energy alternatives, like heat pumps that harness the Earth’s natural energy, to compensate for the loss of the plant.

A Republican candidate and former chief of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Joseph J. Lhota, was adamant in his opposition to a plan to build a 10-story garbage facility on the Upper East Side.

Manhattan is the only borough in the city without a waste-transfer station. Some residents have criticized the practice of hauling garbage outside of the borough for processing, saying it unfairly affects poorer areas.

But Mr. Lhota said the current arrangement was cheaper than building a new facility. “It is in no way, shape or form environmental racism,” he said.

Both Mr. Lhota and Mr. Catsimatidis sought to distance themselves from the national Republican Party, saying they believed that making alternative energy a priority would create jobs.

Several candidates praised Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg’s efforts to reduce carbon emissions in the city and replace aging infrastructure with environmentally friendly buildings.

But Bill de Blasio, the public advocate and a Democratic candidate, said Mr. Bloomberg had not done enough to encourage recycling in the city, describing the mayor’s approach as “on-again and off-again.”

“You need to stick with recycling so that it actually builds momentum,” he said. “Make it a way of life.”

Brian Lehrer, a WNYC radio host, moderated the forum.



Architects Announce Opposition to MoMA Plan for Former Museum Site

Richard Meier, Thom Mayne, Steven Holl, Hugh Hardy and Robert A.M. Stern are among the prominent architects who on Monday called for the Museum of Modern Art to reconsider its decision to demolish the former home of the American Folk Art Museum.

“The Museum of Modern Artâ€"the first museum with a permanent curatorial department of architecture and designâ€"should provide more information about why it considers it necessary to tear down this significant work of contemporary architecture,” the letter said.
“The public has a substantial and legitimate interest in this decision, and the Museum of Modern Art has not yet offered a compelling justification for the cultural and environmental waste of destroying this much-admired, highly distinctive twelve-year-old building.”

Earlier this month, MoMA announced that it would raze the building - which it purchased in 2011 - and replace it with an expansion that will connect to a new tower. The building’s architects, Tod Williams and Billie Tsien, have expressed their disappointment with the decision and a number of others in the profession have publicly protested the decision.

The open letter was written by the Architectural League of New York, a nonprofit organization, and signed by members of its board of directors. The folk art museum has relocated to a smaller space on the Upper West Side.

MoMA said in a statement that it would not comment on the letter at this time.

In an interview last week, Barry Bergdoll, MoMA’s chief curator of architecture and design, said the decision was not an easy one. “It’s incredibly painful to see a really significant building go,” he said. “The conclusion reached makes sense for the future evolution of this complex of buildings and coming up with something that can really show off this collection to its greatest effect.

“Here’s a building that was made for an incredibly important folk art collection that was abandoned by that museum,” Mr. Bergdoll continued. “It’s a kind of bespoke suit for folk art that has tremendous obstacles. You can’t punch walls in the side and expect it to still be the same space.”



‘Matilda’ Opens Big at Broadway Box Office

Milly Shapiro, center, in Sara Krulwich/The New York Times Milly Shapiro, center, in “Matilda the Musical.”

The new Broadway musical “Matilda,” which arrived from London this spring with exceedingly high expectations - and opened April 11 to some of the best reviews of the season - joined the million-dollar club of top-selling shows last week with a gross of $1,129,419, according to box office data provided by the Broadway League, a trade association of theater owners and producers. The show, based on the Roald Dahl children’s novel about a young girl persevering against cruel parents and a sadistic headmistress, sold nearly $2 million in tickets the day after opening and now has advance sales totaling nearly $20 million.

“Matilda” also edged out two other Broadway musicals that appeal to families and children, especially girls: “Cinderella,” which opened in March and grossed $976,098 last week, and “Annie,” which opened in November and took in $813,203. Ticket sales for “Annie” have been softening a bit, but the show has also been running longer than its two competitors - and is bound to see a surge at the box office next month when Emmy Award winner Jane Lynch (“Glee”) starts an eight-week run as Miss Hannigan.

Another new musical, “Kinky Boots,” was nipping at the heels of “Matilda” last week, grossing $1,056,926; the two shows are likely to be the front-runners for the Tony Award for best musical this spring. A third new musical, the jukebox show “Motown,” had an even stronger week at the box office, meanwhile, grossing $1,151,759.

The news was grimmer for two other Broadway musicals. The critically derided revival of “Jekyll & Hyde,” starring Constantine Maroulis and Deborah Cox, grossed $399,086 or only 29 percent of the maximum possible amount, while the Gershwin show “Nice Work If You Can Get It” took in $597,888 or about 43 percent of the maximum possible - one of its most sluggish weeks since opening nearly a year ago.

Among plays, the new one-woman show starring Bette Midler, “I’ll Eat You Last,” set a record for the Booth Theater box office last week, grossing $686,031 for seven sold-out performances (one less than the standard eight). The previous Booth record of $586,512 was set in December 2011 by “Other Desert Cities.” The Midler play officially opens on Wednesday.

Overall Broadway plays and musicals grossed $24.7 million last week, compared to $23.1 million the previous week and $25.9 million for the corresponding week in 2012.



City Says It Will Represent Officer in Occupy Protester’s Lawsuit

Video taken Oct. 14, 2011, shows Deputy Inspector Johnny Cardona appearing to hit a protester.

Following a decision by the Manhattan district attorney not to prosecute a police commander for his actions at Occupy Wall Street protests in 2011, the city said on Monday that it was now in a position to represent him in a federal civil lawsuit.

The Law Department said it had been waiting for a decision on criminal charges from the office of Cyrus R. Vance Jr., the Manhattan district attorney, before stepping forward to represent the commander, Deputy Inspector Johnny Cardona.

“Last week, D.A. Vance closed an investigation of Deputy Inspector Cardona without filing any charges, and the incident is not being investigated by anyone else,” said Michael A. Cardozo, the city’s corporation counsel and top lawyer, in a statement on Monday. “As a result, the Law Department is now able to defend him in the pending civil court action.”

Court papers filed earlier this month in the suit did not describe any representation for the commander, Deputy Inspector Johnny Cardona, and the Law Department said that its lawyers were not in a position to represent him “at the present time.”

Mr. Cardona is named in a federal lawsuit brought by one protester, Felix Rivera-Pitre, who alleges that he was punched in the face during pitched street confrontations between protesters and the police in Lower Manhattan in October 2011.

He is one of two high-ranking police officers facing federal lawsuits stemming from their actions during the Occupy Wall Street protests. The other, Deputy Inspector Anthony Bologna, is accused of indiscriminately pepper-spraying protesters. In that case, the Police Department found that Mr. Bologna had violated its guidelines. As a result, the Law Department is not representing him in his civil suit.

On Friday, Mr. Vance’s office said that after a lengthy investigation it would not file any criminal charges in either matter.

Ronald Kuby, a lawyer for Mr. Rivera-Pitre, said that the continuing investigation by Mr. Vance’s office had made it “difficult for us to obtain materials” related to the case from prosecutors. Mr. Kuby added, “Presumably someone told Vance that he was actually hurting Cardona because the city would not represent him, so Vance announced his phony investigation was over and the city flipped like a pancake.”

Video shot at the protests made both men symbols for those who saw excessive force in the police response to the Occupy protesters.

In the case of Mr. Cardona, several videos shot from different angles on Oct. 14, 2011, appeared to show the inspector grabbing Mr. Rivera-Pitre as he was walking away from him and punching him in the face. The police said at the time that Mr. Rivera-Pitre had earlier attempted to elbow Inspector Cardona and was being sought for attempted assault.

“While I am pleased with the decision to indemnify Deputy Inspector Cardona, it highlights the perversion of the Law Department review process where any possible excuse is identified to abandon an officer who is sued as a result of his taking action in the performance of duty,” said Roy T. Richter, the president of the Captain’s Endowment Union, which represents high-ranking officers.

He also criticized the city for declining to represent Mr. Bologna, calling it “an equal injustice and one that should be corrected in light of the district attorney’s review.”



Redefining a Little Library

Neale Albert in his study on the Upper East Side curling up with one of his favorite miniature books, Joshua Bright for The New York Times Neale Albert in his study on the Upper East Side curling up with one of his favorite miniature books, “La Patria,” bound in 1937.

He browsed the books like a giant looking for something to read. Some were small enough to fit into a fold of his hand. Many of the books were illegibly small, and he didn’t know what they were all about. But reading them was never the point.

Neale Albert, 75, is a collector of miniature books, and he may be the most serious collector living in New York. By definition, miniature books are properly printed and bound, and for the most part no larger than three inches. Mr. Albert has over 4,000 of them, some the size of matchboxes and others smaller than a tab of chewing gum. Some of the books are worth many thousands of dollars.

The Miniature Book Society, established in 1983, is a club of about 400 like-minded members. Mr. Albert, a retired lawyer, has served two terms as its president. “You either are or you aren’t,” he said of his ilk.

“What is it with you and little things?” friends have asked him over the years. He doesn’t have a great explanation. I’ve known Mr. Albert since childhood; he did legal work for my father and they became friends, and my parents still occasionally seek his counsel. And I, too, had often wondered about his fascination with tiny objects.

Part of Mr. Albert’s book collection is stored in a “cottage” on top of the Upper East Side apartment building where he lives with his wife. A small bookcase built specifically for his miniatures, each shelf only a few inches high, is packed with rows of the stout creations, elegantly bound and held inside precious slipcases. There are more in his apartment and in 20-some boxes in storage.

In the field, Mr. Albert is known for commissioning what he calls “miniature designer bindings” - the binding, in this context, referring mainly to the covers â€" that he believes elevate the objects to art. “A designer binding is a book binding usually made on commission,” he said, “and done by a binder who is not just a craftsman, but an artist.”

Mr. Albert making an adjustment to the library in his dollhouse version of Cliveden House, a British mansion, stocked with miniature books from his collection.Joshua Bright for The New York Times Mr. Albert making an adjustment to the library in his dollhouse version of Cliveden House, a British mansion, stocked with miniature books from his collection.

A leather-bound cover for a binding of “Brush Up Your Shakespeare” (part of a collection of bindings he had commissioned for a miniature book version of the Cole Porter song) was interpreted as a pinstripe suit that might be worn at a hot jazz club. A metallic cover for a book of Shakespeare plays bears a carving of a medieval scene. Mr. Albert commissions binders mostly in England and around Europe, and years can pass before the high-precision works are sent back to him.

A miniature version of Shakespeare's Joshua Bright for The New York Times A miniature version of Shakespeare’s “Twelfth Night,” atop a full-size version.

Mr. Albert was born in 1937, grew up in Cambria Heights, Queens, and started collecting early. “I used to get miniature African violets,” he recalls. “Dozens of them. Fast forward a couple years and they’re all over the house. I’m in a club.”

He studied law at Yale and went on to become a prominent mergers-and-acquisitions lawyer at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. But he was always collecting little things. In the cottage’s glass display: a fully operational golf-pencil-size fly fishing rod, complete with string, reel and case; and a walnut-size tool chest filled with functional tools. Mr. Albert’s previous obsessions included English brass tobacco boxes and walking sticks.

His book collection began in the early 1990s as an offshoot of his interest in meticulously detailed dollhouses. He had commissioned a model of Cliveden House in England, where he and his wife had spent a weekend. It required a library.

“What do you need for a library?” he said. “Books.”

So he started buying dollhouse-size books from collectors (partly with the assistance of a publication called International Dolls’ House News). It took years to fill the dollhouse library, but by the time he’d finished, he was addicted.

Recently, Mr. Albert was showing me around the books in his rooftop cottage, when he made me an intriguing offer. “Let’s go downstairs,” he said. “I’ll show you the smallest book in the world.”

In his apartment, Mr. Albert showed me more books, including some with his favorite bindings: an atlas of the British Empire contained a goatskin-bound globe the size of a softball, and a book purporting to contain Voltaire writings held a key embedded in its cover to open the little book of erotica hidden inside. One miniature book was so small that its creator is said to have gone blind after setting its type.

On a bookshelf in the living room, Mr. Albert lifted a secret panel to retrieve what he said was the smallest book in the world. (The book, an edition of a Chekhov short story, is recognized by Guinness World Records as the smallest ever printed, though the claim may be challenged by a book recently created in Japan.)

Inside an ornate wooden box, under a clear protective cover, something minuscule glinted gold. Mr. Albert handed me a magnifying glass. The glint was a book with two covers and about 30 pages between them. It was less than a millimeter across, perhaps the size of a large grain of sand.

“It’s called ‘The Chameleon,’” he said.

“What’s it about?” I asked in awe.

Mr. Albert shrugged, surprised I’d asked. “I don’t know.”

The small gold object inside the white circle is Joshua Bright for The New York Times The small gold object inside the white circle is “The Chameleon,” a book less than a millimeter across.


Redefining a Little Library

Neale Albert in his study on the Upper East Side curling up with one of his favorite miniature books, Joshua Bright for The New York Times Neale Albert in his study on the Upper East Side curling up with one of his favorite miniature books, “La Patria,” bound in 1937.

He browsed the books like a giant looking for something to read. Some were small enough to fit into a fold of his hand. Many of the books were illegibly small, and he didn’t know what they were all about. But reading them was never the point.

Neale Albert, 75, is a collector of miniature books, and he may be the most serious collector living in New York. By definition, miniature books are properly printed and bound, and for the most part no larger than three inches. Mr. Albert has over 4,000 of them, some the size of matchboxes and others smaller than a tab of chewing gum. Some of the books are worth many thousands of dollars.

The Miniature Book Society, established in 1983, is a club of about 400 like-minded members. Mr. Albert, a retired lawyer, has served two terms as its president. “You either are or you aren’t,” he said of his ilk.

“What is it with you and little things?” friends have asked him over the years. He doesn’t have a great explanation. I’ve known Mr. Albert since childhood; he did legal work for my father and they became friends, and my parents still occasionally seek his counsel. And I, too, had often wondered about his fascination with tiny objects.

Part of Mr. Albert’s book collection is stored in a “cottage” on top of the Upper East Side apartment building where he lives with his wife. A small bookcase built specifically for his miniatures, each shelf only a few inches high, is packed with rows of the stout creations, elegantly bound and held inside precious slipcases. There are more in his apartment and in 20-some boxes in storage.

In the field, Mr. Albert is known for commissioning what he calls “miniature designer bindings” - the binding, in this context, referring mainly to the covers â€" that he believes elevate the objects to art. “A designer binding is a book binding usually made on commission,” he said, “and done by a binder who is not just a craftsman, but an artist.”

Mr. Albert making an adjustment to the library in his dollhouse version of Cliveden House, a British mansion, stocked with miniature books from his collection.Joshua Bright for The New York Times Mr. Albert making an adjustment to the library in his dollhouse version of Cliveden House, a British mansion, stocked with miniature books from his collection.

A leather-bound cover for a binding of “Brush Up Your Shakespeare” (part of a collection of bindings he had commissioned for a miniature book version of the Cole Porter song) was interpreted as a pinstripe suit that might be worn at a hot jazz club. A metallic cover for a book of Shakespeare plays bears a carving of a medieval scene. Mr. Albert commissions binders mostly in England and around Europe, and years can pass before the high-precision works are sent back to him.

A miniature version of Shakespeare's Joshua Bright for The New York Times A miniature version of Shakespeare’s “Twelfth Night,” atop a full-size version.

Mr. Albert was born in 1937, grew up in Cambria Heights, Queens, and started collecting early. “I used to get miniature African violets,” he recalls. “Dozens of them. Fast forward a couple years and they’re all over the house. I’m in a club.”

He studied law at Yale and went on to become a prominent mergers-and-acquisitions lawyer at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison. But he was always collecting little things. In the cottage’s glass display: a fully operational golf-pencil-size fly fishing rod, complete with string, reel and case; and a walnut-size tool chest filled with functional tools. Mr. Albert’s previous obsessions included English brass tobacco boxes and walking sticks.

His book collection began in the early 1990s as an offshoot of his interest in meticulously detailed dollhouses. He had commissioned a model of Cliveden House in England, where he and his wife had spent a weekend. It required a library.

“What do you need for a library?” he said. “Books.”

So he started buying dollhouse-size books from collectors (partly with the assistance of a publication called International Dolls’ House News). It took years to fill the dollhouse library, but by the time he’d finished, he was addicted.

Recently, Mr. Albert was showing me around the books in his rooftop cottage, when he made me an intriguing offer. “Let’s go downstairs,” he said. “I’ll show you the smallest book in the world.”

In his apartment, Mr. Albert showed me more books, including some with his favorite bindings: an atlas of the British Empire contained a goatskin-bound globe the size of a softball, and a book purporting to contain Voltaire writings held a key embedded in its cover to open the little book of erotica hidden inside. One miniature book was so small that its creator is said to have gone blind after setting its type.

On a bookshelf in the living room, Mr. Albert lifted a secret panel to retrieve what he said was the smallest book in the world. (The book, an edition of a Chekhov short story, is recognized by Guinness World Records as the smallest ever printed, though the claim may be challenged by a book recently created in Japan.)

Inside an ornate wooden box, under a clear protective cover, something minuscule glinted gold. Mr. Albert handed me a magnifying glass. The glint was a book with two covers and about 30 pages between them. It was less than a millimeter across, perhaps the size of a large grain of sand.

“It’s called ‘The Chameleon,’” he said.

“What’s it about?” I asked in awe.

Mr. Albert shrugged, surprised I’d asked. “I don’t know.”

The small gold object inside the white circle is Joshua Bright for The New York Times The small gold object inside the white circle is “The Chameleon,” a book less than a millimeter across.


A Disturbing Mystery Is Solved, and a Tourist Is in Custody

A security-camera image apparently of Bobby Glen Jackson in the screening lane at the National September 11 Memorial and Museum on April 15. The police say Mr. Jackson hid a gun in a hotel lobby after learning that he would not be able to take it into the memorial.N.Y.P.D. A security-camera image apparently of Bobby Glen Jackson in the screening lane at the National September 11 Memorial and Museum on April 15. The police say Mr. Jackson hid a gun in a hotel lobby after learning that he would not be able to take it into the memorial.

The man who inadvertently set off a sweeping police investigation when he hid his pistol under a cushion in a World Trade Center hotel lobby â€" minutes before the Boston Marathon bombing â€" was a tourist simply in a hurry to stow it and get back to his tour group, a family member said on Monday.

The man, Bobby Glen Jackson, 59, was arrested Saturday in Fayetteville, N.C., and was scheduled to be brought to New York City on Monday to face charges of criminal possession of a weapon and reckless endangerment, the police said. Mr. Jackson owns a pressure-washing business in Fayetteville and does security work, which is why he owns a pistol, said the family member, who asked to remain anonymous.

“He’s not perfect by any means, but he’s a good man,” the relative said. “He’s a God-fearing man. If what had happened there had happened here, and it hadn’t been times like now, everything would be O.K., because everybody would know him.”

As I wrote in Saturday’s Crime Scene column, around 2 p.m. last Monday a man entered the lobby of the World Center Hotel and tucked a pistol under a seat cushion in the lobby. A woman discovered the gun when she sat on it a short while later, and a manager alerted police officers outside. The hotel is directly beside the entrance to the National September 11 Memorial and Museum, where security is heavy and firearms are forbidden.

The bombing in Boston occurred practically simultaneously to the discovery of the gun, stirring fears that the two episodes were connected and that an attack in New York was imminent. The police officers reviewed video from the hotel, and saw a husky, bald man place a gun under the cushion. In video from the memorial, the officers spotted the same man approach an employee, who later told them that he had been asked if off-duty law enforcement officers were allowed to carry guns inside, the police said. When the employee answered no, the man hid the gun before entering the memorial, where he spent half an hour.

Detectives combed the area’s video feeds, even investigating a bald man who resembled Mr. Jackson who was seen at the time in a nearby bar. Finally, detectives determined when his ticket to the memorial was scanned and saw that he was part of a tour group staying at a hotel in New Jersey. Detectives visited the hotel on Thursday and learned his identity from a tour guide, the police said.

The day he hid the gun, Mr. Jackson had met the group outside the hotel for their ride into Manhattan, but asked the bus to wait while he retrieved something from his room. Asked later what he had forgotten, Mr. Jackson replied, “My gun,” said Paul J. Browne, a police spokesman.

Mr. Jackson has no permit to carry a gun in New York City, meaning that he was in violation of the law, Mr. Browne said. The reckless endangerment charge stems from placing the gun in a public place.

He would not be the first tourist to be arrested for carrying a legally owned gun in the city, and would not even have been the first caught carrying a gun at the memorial. In 2011, a nurse from Tennessee was arrested after asking a police officer outside the memorial where she could check the pistol in her purse.

Mr. Jackson was visiting New York with his wife and daughter, who was on a school trip, his relative said. The police said his tour group also visited the International Beauty Show at the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center.

When he returned to the World Center Hotel lobby and found his gun missing, he did not report it to the police.

“He thought that whoever found it, they would contact him and want a reward,” Mr. Jackson’s relative said. “He is not a crook.”



Met Opera Announces Outdoor Performances

The Metropolitan Opera released the performers, dates and places on Monday for the free park recitals it sponsors every summer in lieu of full-scale opera performances, which were suspended after 2007 because of the cost. The soprano Erin Morley, the mezzo-soprano Isabel Leonard and the tenor Stephen Costello, accompanied by the pianist Bradley Moore, will sing at Central Park’s SummerStage on July 16 and at Brooklyn Bridge Park on July 19.

In four more concerts, the soprano Ying Fang, the tenor Mario Chang and the bass-baritone Brandon Cedel, again accompanied by Mr. Moore, will appear at Crotona Park in the Bronx on July 23; Clove Lakes Park in Staten Island on July 25; Jackie Robinson Park in Manhattan on July 30; and Socrates Sculpture Park in Queens on Aug. 1. The Met will also repeat outdoor screenings in Lincoln Center of its high-definition theater broadcasts starting on Aug. 24. It will present 10 screenings.



Met Opera Announces Outdoor Performances

The Metropolitan Opera released the performers, dates and places on Monday for the free park recitals it sponsors every summer in lieu of full-scale opera performances, which were suspended after 2007 because of the cost. The soprano Erin Morley, the mezzo-soprano Isabel Leonard and the tenor Stephen Costello, accompanied by the pianist Bradley Moore, will sing at Central Park’s SummerStage on July 16 and at Brooklyn Bridge Park on July 19.

In four more concerts, the soprano Ying Fang, the tenor Mario Chang and the bass-baritone Brandon Cedel, again accompanied by Mr. Moore, will appear at Crotona Park in the Bronx on July 23; Clove Lakes Park in Staten Island on July 25; Jackie Robinson Park in Manhattan on July 30; and Socrates Sculpture Park in Queens on Aug. 1. The Met will also repeat outdoor screenings in Lincoln Center of its high-definition theater broadcasts starting on Aug. 24. It will present 10 screenings.



Met Opera Announces Outdoor Performances

The Metropolitan Opera released the performers, dates and places on Monday for the free park recitals it sponsors every summer in lieu of full-scale opera performances, which were suspended after 2007 because of the cost. The soprano Erin Morley, the mezzo-soprano Isabel Leonard and the tenor Stephen Costello, accompanied by the pianist Bradley Moore, will sing at Central Park’s SummerStage on July 16 and at Brooklyn Bridge Park on July 19.

In four more concerts, the soprano Ying Fang, the tenor Mario Chang and the bass-baritone Brandon Cedel, again accompanied by Mr. Moore, will appear at Crotona Park in the Bronx on July 23; Clove Lakes Park in Staten Island on July 25; Jackie Robinson Park in Manhattan on July 30; and Socrates Sculpture Park in Queens on Aug. 1. The Met will also repeat outdoor screenings in Lincoln Center of its high-definition theater broadcasts starting on Aug. 24. It will present 10 screenings.



Met Opera Announces Outdoor Performances

The Metropolitan Opera released the performers, dates and places on Monday for the free park recitals it sponsors every summer in lieu of full-scale opera performances, which were suspended after 2007 because of the cost. The soprano Erin Morley, the mezzo-soprano Isabel Leonard and the tenor Stephen Costello, accompanied by the pianist Bradley Moore, will sing at Central Park’s SummerStage on July 16 and at Brooklyn Bridge Park on July 19.

In four more concerts, the soprano Ying Fang, the tenor Mario Chang and the bass-baritone Brandon Cedel, again accompanied by Mr. Moore, will appear at Crotona Park in the Bronx on July 23; Clove Lakes Park in Staten Island on July 25; Jackie Robinson Park in Manhattan on July 30; and Socrates Sculpture Park in Queens on Aug. 1. The Met will also repeat outdoor screenings in Lincoln Center of its high-definition theater broadcasts starting on Aug. 24. It will present 10 screenings.



Tribeca Film Festival Turns Away Protesters Who Had Tickets to ‘Gasland’ Sequel

A group of protesters who tried to attend a premiere screening of the documentary “Gasland Part II” at the Tribeca Film Festival was denied admission on Sunday, leading to a disagreement on Monday over the reason: protesters say they were thrown out for asking difficult questions about the film, and the festival’s organizers say the screening was full.

“Gasland Part II,” directed by Josh Fox, is a sequel to his 2010 documentary, “Gasland,” which explores the environmental impact of natural gas drilling and hydraulic fracking, and which was nominated for an Academy Award for best documentary feature.

The protest group that tried to attend the screening included about 20 farmers and laborers from Pennsylvania and upstate New York, as well as Phelim McAleer, a journalist and documentarian whose work includes “FrackNation,” a film that disputes the findings of “Gasland.”

Mr. McAleer said in a statement that he and the protesters were barred “by a barrage of security officers” because they trid to ask Mr. Fox “some inconvenient questions when he was on the red carpet.”

On Monday, press representatives for the Tribeca Film Festival said in a statement: “Guests that had purchased advance tickets and were in line for the film 30 minutes prior, as our ticket policy states, were admitted into the screening. Once the house was at capacity, the remaining ticket holders who had not been in line were unfortunately not able to be accommodated in the theater.”

The statement continued: “We are sorry that the few ticket holders who stayed outside gave up their seats to those who waited in line. The film is being shown three more times during the festival and we welcome them to come to any of those screenings.”

Reached by phone on Monday afternoon, Mr. McAleer said the Tribeca organizers were offering “a post-facto justification for not wanting dissenting opinions and ordinary Americans at the screening.”

“These are the people the Tribeca Film Festival should be encouraging to come,” he added.

Mr. McAleer said he planned to post a video on YouTube later on Monday that would show the confrontation and that he said would support his account of events.



Annual Giveaway Will Include 500,000 Books

World Book Night, the publishing industry’s massive annual book giveaway, will be celebrated on Tuesday in 28 events across the country. This year, 500,000 books will be handed out in nursing homes, schools, firehouses and diners, among other places, in an effort to lure people who read rarely or not at all.

The books, which include “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood, “The Alchemist” by Paulo Coelho, “Looking for Alaska” by John Green and “My Antonia” by Willa Cather, were selected by a panel of booksellers and librarians and donated by publishers, retailers and libraries.



Annual Giveaway Will Include 500,000 Books

World Book Night, the publishing industry’s massive annual book giveaway, will be celebrated on Tuesday in 28 events across the country. This year, 500,000 books will be handed out in nursing homes, schools, firehouses and diners, among other places, in an effort to lure people who read rarely or not at all.

The books, which include “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood, “The Alchemist” by Paulo Coelho, “Looking for Alaska” by John Green and “My Antonia” by Willa Cather, were selected by a panel of booksellers and librarians and donated by publishers, retailers and libraries.



Annual Giveaway Will Include 500,000 Books

World Book Night, the publishing industry’s massive annual book giveaway, will be celebrated on Tuesday in 28 events across the country. This year, 500,000 books will be handed out in nursing homes, schools, firehouses and diners, among other places, in an effort to lure people who read rarely or not at all.

The books, which include “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood, “The Alchemist” by Paulo Coelho, “Looking for Alaska” by John Green and “My Antonia” by Willa Cather, were selected by a panel of booksellers and librarians and donated by publishers, retailers and libraries.



‘Once’ Turns To Britain for New Broadway Leads

The hit Broadway musical “Once” announced some unexpected casting news on Monday - the sort of news that tends to disappoint aspiring actors in New York theater. The musical’s lead performers, Ben Hope and Laura Dreyfuss, who were named to the roles of Guy and Girl in March, are being replaced by two British newcomers to Broadway, Arthur Darvill and Joanna Christie, who will make their debuts in the show on Tuesday.

What makes the announcement unusual is that the producers of “Once” had not indicated that Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss would be temporary when naming them as the show’s stars last month.

Indeed, Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss were announced with fanfare for several reasons: They were taking over for Steve Kazee - who won a Tony Award last June playing Guy - and Cristin Milioti, who was nominated for a Tony as Girl; they were ascending in the show that had won the Tony for best musical; and the two actors had previously been the standbys for Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti, waiting in the wings to perform whenever the leads were sick or on vacation. For the countless performers who have been standbys on Broadway, the dream is always to take over the role full-time someday, though it rarely happens in this era when producers seek new stars to replace the outgoing ones.

A spokeswoman for “Once,” Susanne Tighe, said on Monday that Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss had not been pushed out. Rather, she said, the producers’ plan all along was to have them in the lead roles temporarily. “We didn’t know when Arthur and Joanna’s visas were going to be completed, so we couldn’t include end dates for Ben and Laura in the March casting announcement,” Ms. Tighe said.

Asked why their temporary status wasn’t included in the March announcement, Ms. Tighe repeated the point about the visas. She said the casting of Mr. Darvill and Ms. Christie was not a reflection on the strengths of Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss. Asked why the producers were casting two British actors in the role when American actors like Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss were available, Ms. Tighe said, “The creative team and the producers liked Arthur and Joanna.”

The musical is about an Irishman and a Czech woman falling in love in Dublin, and their friends and family. Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti are American.

New York producers can cast British actors in Broadway shows under an exchange program with British theater organizations. Actors Equity Association signed off on the “Once” casting; a spokeswoman for Equity did not immediately have further comment. Mr. Darvill has appeared on the BBC show “Doctor Who” as one of the doctor’s companions, Rory Williams, while Ms. Christie has appeared in British theater and television productions. A separate production of “Once” recently began performances in London.

Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss will be returning to standby status in “Once,” meanwhile. Neither immediately replied to requests seeking comment on Monday.



‘Once’ Turns To Britain for New Broadway Leads

The hit Broadway musical “Once” announced some unexpected casting news on Monday - the sort of news that tends to disappoint aspiring actors in New York theater. The musical’s lead performers, Ben Hope and Laura Dreyfuss, who were named to the roles of Guy and Girl in March, are being replaced by two British newcomers to Broadway, Arthur Darvill and Joanna Christie, who will make their debuts in the show on Tuesday.

What makes the announcement unusual is that the producers of “Once” had not indicated that Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss would be temporary when naming them as the show’s stars last month.

Indeed, Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss were announced with fanfare for several reasons: They were taking over for Steve Kazee - who won a Tony Award last June playing Guy - and Cristin Milioti, who was nominated for a Tony as Girl; they were ascending in the show that had won the Tony for best musical; and the two actors had previously been the standbys for Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti, waiting in the wings to perform whenever the leads were sick or on vacation. For the countless performers who have been standbys on Broadway, the dream is always to take over the role full-time someday, though it rarely happens in this era when producers seek new stars to replace the outgoing ones.

A spokeswoman for “Once,” Susanne Tighe, said on Monday that Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss had not been pushed out. Rather, she said, the producers’ plan all along was to have them in the lead roles temporarily. “We didn’t know when Arthur and Joanna’s visas were going to be completed, so we couldn’t include end dates for Ben and Laura in the March casting announcement,” Ms. Tighe said.

Asked why their temporary status wasn’t included in the March announcement, Ms. Tighe repeated the point about the visas. She said the casting of Mr. Darvill and Ms. Christie was not a reflection on the strengths of Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss. Asked why the producers were casting two British actors in the role when American actors like Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss were available, Ms. Tighe said, “The creative team and the producers liked Arthur and Joanna.”

The musical is about an Irishman and a Czech woman falling in love in Dublin, and their friends and family. Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti are American.

New York producers can cast British actors in Broadway shows under an exchange program with British theater organizations. Actors Equity Association signed off on the “Once” casting; a spokeswoman for Equity did not immediately have further comment. Mr. Darvill has appeared on the BBC show “Doctor Who” as one of the doctor’s companions, Rory Williams, while Ms. Christie has appeared in British theater and television productions. A separate production of “Once” recently began performances in London.

Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss will be returning to standby status in “Once,” meanwhile. Neither immediately replied to requests seeking comment on Monday.



‘Once’ Turns To Britain for New Broadway Leads

The hit Broadway musical “Once” announced some unexpected casting news on Monday - the sort of news that tends to disappoint aspiring actors in New York theater. The musical’s lead performers, Ben Hope and Laura Dreyfuss, who were named to the roles of Guy and Girl in March, are being replaced by two British newcomers to Broadway, Arthur Darvill and Joanna Christie, who will make their debuts in the show on Tuesday.

What makes the announcement unusual is that the producers of “Once” had not indicated that Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss would be temporary when naming them as the show’s stars last month.

Indeed, Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss were announced with fanfare for several reasons: They were taking over for Steve Kazee - who won a Tony Award last June playing Guy - and Cristin Milioti, who was nominated for a Tony as Girl; they were ascending in the show that had won the Tony for best musical; and the two actors had previously been the standbys for Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti, waiting in the wings to perform whenever the leads were sick or on vacation. For the countless performers who have been standbys on Broadway, the dream is always to take over the role full-time someday, though it rarely happens in this era when producers seek new stars to replace the outgoing ones.

A spokeswoman for “Once,” Susanne Tighe, said on Monday that Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss had not been pushed out. Rather, she said, the producers’ plan all along was to have them in the lead roles temporarily. “We didn’t know when Arthur and Joanna’s visas were going to be completed, so we couldn’t include end dates for Ben and Laura in the March casting announcement,” Ms. Tighe said.

Asked why their temporary status wasn’t included in the March announcement, Ms. Tighe repeated the point about the visas. She said the casting of Mr. Darvill and Ms. Christie was not a reflection on the strengths of Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss. Asked why the producers were casting two British actors in the role when American actors like Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss were available, Ms. Tighe said, “The creative team and the producers liked Arthur and Joanna.”

The musical is about an Irishman and a Czech woman falling in love in Dublin, and their friends and family. Mr. Kazee and Ms. Milioti are American.

New York producers can cast British actors in Broadway shows under an exchange program with British theater organizations. Actors Equity Association signed off on the “Once” casting; a spokeswoman for Equity did not immediately have further comment. Mr. Darvill has appeared on the BBC show “Doctor Who” as one of the doctor’s companions, Rory Williams, while Ms. Christie has appeared in British theater and television productions. A separate production of “Once” recently began performances in London.

Mr. Hope and Ms. Dreyfuss will be returning to standby status in “Once,” meanwhile. Neither immediately replied to requests seeking comment on Monday.



Tribeca Film Festival: Ramin Bahrani Goes Big

Like many people in this food-obsessed age, Ramin Bahrani recently found himself curious about the provenance of what ended up on his dinner plate. Unlike most, however, he responded by moving to the heartland and making a film about a family farmer striving to build a modest agribusiness empire.

The film, “At Any Price,” had its premiere at the Tribeca Film Festival on Friday (it opens in limited release on Wednesday). It represents an almost total departure for Mr. Bahrani, the director of acclaimed films like “Chop Shop” and “Man Push Cart,” claustrophobic, small-scale works that star mostly unprofessional actors and track immigrants at the margins of cities.

Ramin BahraniJoel Ryan/Associated Press Ramin Bahrani

“At Any Price,” conversely, features toothy stars like Dennis Quaid, Zac Efron and Heather Graham, and luxuriates in the Midwest’s wide-open spaces. A car-racing subplot includes blockbuster-worthy driving scenes that might surprise fans of Mr. Bahrani’s quieter work.

“My agent was like, ‘I’m going to put you up for ‘Fast and Furious, Part 9,’” he said, laughing.

Mr. Bahrani wanted to make a different sort of farm film, one mostly devoid of the usual Steinbeckian struggles and pieties about hard-working families and the land. The filmmaker lived with farmers in Iowa and Illinois for six months to prepare for the film, and the script reflects what he saw there: sophisticated multimillion-dollar operations maintained by air-conditioned, GPS-enabled tractors that literally drove themselves.

“There was no chickens or cows, or vegetables growing in the garden,” he said. “And no bank was coming to foreclose on the home as nostalgic music played.”

Mr. Quaid is Henry Whipple, a morally flexible farmer and seed salesman with dynastic ambitions. Mr. Efron is the son with dreams of his own. A gifted amateur race-car driver, he aims to go pro and leave the family farm in his rearview mirror. Charged intergenerational angst ensues as various mortal threats to the family’s enterprises arise. As the title suggests, the story take some unexpected â€" and unexpectedly dark â€" turns.

Mr. Bahrani discussed “At Any Price” in a recent phone interview. In edited excerpts, he discusses talking stars out of their makeup and striking out at product placement.

Q.

Your previous films have been based in cities. How did you end up in the heartland?

A.

I was curious about where my food came from. That led to reading Michael Pollan’s work, and a good friend of mine who works at The New York Times, Dan Barry, had written an interesting piece about dairy farms. I had no idea farming was such a big business, and that it was run by businessmen, not farmers, really. Dan’s and Michael’s work led me to Iowa.

Q.

You spent six months there. What were your general impressions?

A.

These were very good, warmhearted people who were under a massive amount of pressure. Every single farmer I met, without fail, told me what runs his life are the mottos, “expand or die” or “get big or get out.” That’s how the film started to come together.

Q.

The whole “expand or die” theme would seem to have broader implications.

A.

It’s everywhere. It’s Wall Street. It’s the banking crisis. It’s Walmart smashing up Main Street. It’s your own industry, journalism. It’s one person writing a review of my film in Miami that is going to get published in 200 newspapers across the country.

Q.

So you hung out with farmers and then this story emerged?

A.

The last piece that started to make it come together in my mind was I met a genetically modified seed salesman who was also a farmer in Woodward, Iowa. I never knew there was such an occupation. At that point, I also was immediately thinking about “Death of a Salesman” and Willy Loman, and these themes of “expand or die” matched it. That became a shadow to the screenplay as it was being written.

Q.

Even the name Henry Whipple, like Willy Loman, has this evocative impotence to it.

A.

I agree. I met a farmer in Illinois and his name was Whipple, and I quickly wrote it down.

Q.

There are plenty of big themes here â€" the “go big or go home” ethos, the corporatization of farming. What specifically did you want to explore?

A.

All of those things. I don’t really want to limit the meaning of the film. If you know my other work, I never provide a conclusion. I don’t wrap up my films with a tidy bow that would explain everything. But it’s not an agenda movie. If it was, I would lead the stampede out of the cinema. Nobody likes an agenda film. It’s really a father-son story. It’s a family story. At the heart of it is Quaid and Efron, really.

Q.

This is your first film with “movie stars.” How was that different?

A.

I started with Dennis and it’s just amazing how much he adds to the role. The physicality of his part was completely something he invented and created. The way he holds his shoulders and his neck, his fist being clenched. He did something that I just would not have been able to do alone, and I would not have been able to do it with a nonprofessional.

Q.

What was the budget?

A.

Well under $5 million. Dennis’s and Zac’s trailers were either their cars or the sofa at the farm where we shot the film. Literally.

Q.

This seems like one of those situations where product placement would actually enhance the reality of the film. In other words, did John Deere underwrite the whole movie?

A.

[Laughs.] No, are you kidding me? We tried our hardest to get product placement and it was very challenging to get any money out of those things. I don’t know how they do it, really. John Deere had no interest in that. I wish. If you’re good at that, please come onto my next film. You can help me finance it.

Q.

What did your stars know about your work beforehand?

A.

I spent time with Dennis in Austin. He said, “I want to be like that kid in ‘Chop Shop,’ when he closes the garage door and locks it with a screwdriver, just that mechanical action.” He said, “Can you make me like that?” I couldn’t believe it â€" I never expected a movie star to say things like this. So the next day I had enough courage to say, “Dennis, would you do no hair and makeup?” And he said of course. I mentioned it to Zac, and he said, “I don’t care about that kind of stuff.”

Q.

Arguably Zac doesn’t need to care about that kind of stuff.

A.

[Laughs.] It’s true â€" he’s really photogenic and handsome. But I think his performance is phenomenally good. He’s a gifted actor and I really think he should be playing complex roles like this.

Q.

Did you have any preconceived notions about him going into it?

A.

Zac and I spoke about how I want to do something new. I told him people will probably judge me unfairly, based on my previous films, on what I can and can’t do, and what they think I should be doing. I don’t want to do what people think I should be doing; I want to do what I want to do. And he said, “Me too.”

Q.

The race scenes are certainly something different for you. What did you know about racing before going into it?

A.

I’m really embarrassed to say this, because I’m from North Carolina and we created Nascar, but I didn’t know anything about it. So we went to all these figure 8 races and met the drivers. I drove a little bit. Based on my previous films, I think people are really shocked that the racing sequences are kind of good.

Q.

They’re quite gripping, and I couldn’t imagine you’d done much of that before.

A.

No I haven’t. The closest I came was a guy pushing a cart in the street in “Man Push Cart.” [Laughs.] Don’t worry though, I’ll turn down “Fast and Furious” like all the other Hollywood projects I get sent to me. No thanks.



Comedy Central Cancels ‘Futurama’

The delivery boy Fry carefully considers his options now that Twentieth Century Fox The delivery boy Fry carefully considers his options now that “Futurama” has been cancelled.

This time, Professor Farnsworth does not have good news, everyone. Comedy Central said on Monday that it would not be ordering any additional seasons of “Futurama,” its madcap animated series about a hapless delivery boy from the year 1999 who is cryogenically frozen and awakens in the 31st century.

Comedy Central had itself previously resurrected “Futurama” from a long slumber after it was canceled by Fox. The series, from the “Simpsons” creator Matt Groening and David X. Cohen, originally ran on Fox for 72 episodes between 1999 and 2003. After Comedy Central acquired syndication rights to these episodes in 2005, four direct-to-DVD “Futurama” movies were produced by the Fox studio, and when these DVDs were successful, Comedy Central commissioned new seasons of the series, and began showing them in 2010.



Dylan Touring With Wilco and My Morning Jacket

Bob Dylan will be touring with My Morning Jacket and Wilco this summer, an unusually strong lineup for what the influential songwriter has dubbed the AmericanaramA Festival of Music.

Though the tour is skipping the major arenas and stadiums in the New York City area, he will play an outdoor concert in Hoboken on Pier A on July 26.

Mr. Dylan posted an announcement for the tour on his Web site on Sunday, along with a facsimile of a poster saying “Meet me there - Beat me there!” The Richard Thompson Electric Trio and Ryan Bingham will join the tour in some cities.

The tour will include 26 concerts with Wilco and My Morning Jacket, both headlining acts on their own. It starts in West Palm Beach, Fla., on June 26 and finishes in Mountain View, Calif., on Aug. 4, Rolling Stone reported.



Talking ‘Mad Men’: A Plot for Dawn

Every Monday morning, Sloane Crosley and Logan Hill will be offering their post-”Mad Men” analysis here. Read on and share your reactions to Joan vs. Harry, Don vs. Paggy, and Dawn vs. her dialogue, in the comments:

Sloane Crosley: Well, it looks like things are picking up slightly from last we left off. I wonder if each episode will feature an Attack of the Underdog. First Trudy and now Harry. What did you think of Harry’s Take-Your-25-Thousand-And-Shove-It revolt?

Logan Hill: Yes! Trudy’s rant was my favorite bit last week, and I felt like this week’s episode was an improvement, partly because of Harry’s subplot. Though I worry that Broadway Joe on Broadway will be a catastrophe â€" how could it be otherwise? â€" and Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce will never see that $. I almost hope this is Harry’s swan song.

SC: If Roger has anything to do with it, it will be. All the “Yankee Doodle Dandy” and Notre Dame fight song sing-alongs won’t save Harry or Dow Chemical from Kenny’s beautifully big-eyed assessment that “if he wants people to stop hating him, maybe he should stop dropping napalm on children.” Harry, as a character, is a penny that should be left under the mat. I like, him, I do, but I was never frustrated by his lack of success or gumption as I have been with other characters. Thus I was not rooting for this. I think he’ll get the axe.

LH: It’s funny we agree on this â€" I loathe Harry, but my “Mad Men” plot predictions are always guided by Peggy’s line, “Every time something good happens, something bad happens.” The last guy to land a big account was Lane. And Joan! Congrats on the partnership: Now everyone’s going to call you a prostitute when they disagree with you. What did you make of that?

SC: I thought it lacked oomph. But we have to remember that a pretty significant amount of time (in day-to-day office years) has passed and so I don’t think it’s supposed to have the emotional gravity it had last season when Joan emerges from the bedroom, having already slept with Herb from Jaguar, Don too late to stop it. It’s not even being churned out by the rumor mill anymore. It’s part of the mill itself. So the fact that Joan would feel bad enough to be unable to enjoy herself with Katie seemed off. How Joan got where she is is almost a side note. At this point, she’s been working at the agency for 15 years and she’s the only partner who the secretaries refer to by her first name. That would tick me off.

LH: I was thrilled to get more of Joanie (ahem) but as her pal demonstrates, the reality of her life is much less appealing than the fantasy of it and her perfect image: I saw that theme in the plotline of Dawn, who’s disappointed by Madison Avenue, in SCDP’s fantasy of the Heinz account, and in that way a foursome always sounds more fun until it’s actually proposed across the dinner table. Did you see a parallel between Joan and Megan this week?

SC: Ha. Does it, Logan? Does it always sound more fun? Maybe when Ted McGinley from “Married With Children” is doing the asking. I think there’s always a parallel between the women and Matthew Weiner, the show’s creator, does a marvelous job of showing us how the women on the show have to be just as ingenious and scheming as the men but do it with one hand tied behind their backs. I didn’t see a direct parallel beyond that, but I was more interested in Megan this time around. I like how she’s become a walking symbol of Don’s hypocrisy. Do you find her remotely interesting?

LH: Skipping your first question! I actually think Megan’s a wonderful character â€" a fun, smart woman caught up in this madness â€" but, yes, I’m worried she’s becoming nothing more than a foil for Don. There’s that moment when Don says seeing her make out is “a helluva lot worse than letting my imagination run wild.” You think: Don, your whole career and personal philosophy is built around running away from reality and living in your imagination. Though the prostitution theme (Don’s flashbacks, Joan, Megan) is a little heavy, no?

SC: Well, there’s certainly a deflation rate. “From Dollars to Cents: The ‘Mad Men’ Story.” Megan has become more like his third child. He’s concerned for her but long gone are the days of her scrubbing the white carpet and telling him he doesn’t get to watch. I thought it was a very important moment for their relationship when he follows her into her dressing room. Either they were both going to be aroused or both going to be upset. Obviously it was the later.

LH: Great point: She’s become a person in Don’s mind, and not a fantasy anymore. So the kink is gone. Despite the French maid outfit!

SC: The bangs ruined that outfit for me.

LH: I have no criticism of that outfit. But I did hate the way the show cut directly from Don and Megan to Don picking up the penny and entering Sylvia’s apartment. It felt clumsy. I was on board with that episode until that last scene. It was almost as stiff and on-the-nose as Dawn’s dialogue.

SC: I was just going to bring up Dawn! The bad job she’s doing is not that of “Maid of Honor” but of “Actress”! Though maybe that’s because Mr. Weiner’s handing her some seriously bum dialogue? But yes, to your point, that was my issue with Sylvia as well. Unlike the heavy-handed prostitution theme, her religious conflicts are not prominent enough for her dialogue to carry any weight.

LH: I may file an equal-opportunity suit against Matthew Weiner demanding better lines for Dawn next week. And the line about taking off the crucifix seemed ludicrous, especially coming from Don. And though I really liked this episode until this scene â€" that last line killed me. Really, Sylvia, you’re praying that Don will “find peace” after he leaves? Ugh.

SC: Let’s make it a class-action suit. Pretty sure we can get some of the commenters on board. Anyway, Don is supposed to be all about what you don’t see, right? Like a failed ketchup print ad. Their whole bit was just as transparent and disappointing.

LH: Yes: So let’s wrap up with a few questions for the comment section: Will Broadway Joe’s football musical revue be trouble with a capital TD? Will Joan have her revenge upon Harry? And do readers agree with me that this episode was an improvement upon the first two?

SC: This was the first time we saw Don and Peggy go up against each other for an account. And both of them failed. Was this a warm-up for a more definitive battle down the road? And, of course, the question that’s been at the forefront of our minds: Why does Stan feel the effects of marijuana faster than any human on the planet?

Sloane Crosley is the author of “How Did You Get This Number” and “I Was Told There’d Be Cake“; Logan Hill is a journalist who has contributed to The New York Times, New York, GQ, Rolling Stone, Wired and others.



Talking ‘Mad Men’: A Plot for Dawn

Every Monday morning, Sloane Crosley and Logan Hill will be offering their post-”Mad Men” analysis here. Read on and share your reactions to Joan vs. Harry, Don vs. Paggy, and Dawn vs. her dialogue, in the comments:

Sloane Crosley: Well, it looks like things are picking up slightly from last we left off. I wonder if each episode will feature an Attack of the Underdog. First Trudy and now Harry. What did you think of Harry’s Take-Your-25-Thousand-And-Shove-It revolt?

Logan Hill: Yes! Trudy’s rant was my favorite bit last week, and I felt like this week’s episode was an improvement, partly because of Harry’s subplot. Though I worry that Broadway Joe on Broadway will be a catastrophe â€" how could it be otherwise? â€" and Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce will never see that $. I almost hope this is Harry’s swan song.

SC: If Roger has anything to do with it, it will be. All the “Yankee Doodle Dandy” and Notre Dame fight song sing-alongs won’t save Harry or Dow Chemical from Kenny’s beautifully big-eyed assessment that “if he wants people to stop hating him, maybe he should stop dropping napalm on children.” Harry, as a character, is a penny that should be left under the mat. I like, him, I do, but I was never frustrated by his lack of success or gumption as I have been with other characters. Thus I was not rooting for this. I think he’ll get the axe.

LH: It’s funny we agree on this â€" I loathe Harry, but my “Mad Men” plot predictions are always guided by Peggy’s line, “Every time something good happens, something bad happens.” The last guy to land a big account was Lane. And Joan! Congrats on the partnership: Now everyone’s going to call you a prostitute when they disagree with you. What did you make of that?

SC: I thought it lacked oomph. But we have to remember that a pretty significant amount of time (in day-to-day office years) has passed and so I don’t think it’s supposed to have the emotional gravity it had last season when Joan emerges from the bedroom, having already slept with Herb from Jaguar, Don too late to stop it. It’s not even being churned out by the rumor mill anymore. It’s part of the mill itself. So the fact that Joan would feel bad enough to be unable to enjoy herself with Katie seemed off. How Joan got where she is is almost a side note. At this point, she’s been working at the agency for 15 years and she’s the only partner who the secretaries refer to by her first name. That would tick me off.

LH: I was thrilled to get more of Joanie (ahem) but as her pal demonstrates, the reality of her life is much less appealing than the fantasy of it and her perfect image: I saw that theme in the plotline of Dawn, who’s disappointed by Madison Avenue, in SCDP’s fantasy of the Heinz account, and in that way a foursome always sounds more fun until it’s actually proposed across the dinner table. Did you see a parallel between Joan and Megan this week?

SC: Ha. Does it, Logan? Does it always sound more fun? Maybe when Ted McGinley from “Married With Children” is doing the asking. I think there’s always a parallel between the women and Matthew Weiner, the show’s creator, does a marvelous job of showing us how the women on the show have to be just as ingenious and scheming as the men but do it with one hand tied behind their backs. I didn’t see a direct parallel beyond that, but I was more interested in Megan this time around. I like how she’s become a walking symbol of Don’s hypocrisy. Do you find her remotely interesting?

LH: Skipping your first question! I actually think Megan’s a wonderful character â€" a fun, smart woman caught up in this madness â€" but, yes, I’m worried she’s becoming nothing more than a foil for Don. There’s that moment when Don says seeing her make out is “a helluva lot worse than letting my imagination run wild.” You think: Don, your whole career and personal philosophy is built around running away from reality and living in your imagination. Though the prostitution theme (Don’s flashbacks, Joan, Megan) is a little heavy, no?

SC: Well, there’s certainly a deflation rate. “From Dollars to Cents: The ‘Mad Men’ Story.” Megan has become more like his third child. He’s concerned for her but long gone are the days of her scrubbing the white carpet and telling him he doesn’t get to watch. I thought it was a very important moment for their relationship when he follows her into her dressing room. Either they were both going to be aroused or both going to be upset. Obviously it was the later.

LH: Great point: She’s become a person in Don’s mind, and not a fantasy anymore. So the kink is gone. Despite the French maid outfit!

SC: The bangs ruined that outfit for me.

LH: I have no criticism of that outfit. But I did hate the way the show cut directly from Don and Megan to Don picking up the penny and entering Sylvia’s apartment. It felt clumsy. I was on board with that episode until that last scene. It was almost as stiff and on-the-nose as Dawn’s dialogue.

SC: I was just going to bring up Dawn! The bad job she’s doing is not that of “Maid of Honor” but of “Actress”! Though maybe that’s because Mr. Weiner’s handing her some seriously bum dialogue? But yes, to your point, that was my issue with Sylvia as well. Unlike the heavy-handed prostitution theme, her religious conflicts are not prominent enough for her dialogue to carry any weight.

LH: I may file an equal-opportunity suit against Matthew Weiner demanding better lines for Dawn next week. And the line about taking off the crucifix seemed ludicrous, especially coming from Don. And though I really liked this episode until this scene â€" that last line killed me. Really, Sylvia, you’re praying that Don will “find peace” after he leaves? Ugh.

SC: Let’s make it a class-action suit. Pretty sure we can get some of the commenters on board. Anyway, Don is supposed to be all about what you don’t see, right? Like a failed ketchup print ad. Their whole bit was just as transparent and disappointing.

LH: Yes: So let’s wrap up with a few questions for the comment section: Will Broadway Joe’s football musical revue be trouble with a capital TD? Will Joan have her revenge upon Harry? And do readers agree with me that this episode was an improvement upon the first two?

SC: This was the first time we saw Don and Peggy go up against each other for an account. And both of them failed. Was this a warm-up for a more definitive battle down the road? And, of course, the question that’s been at the forefront of our minds: Why does Stan feel the effects of marijuana faster than any human on the planet?

Sloane Crosley is the author of “How Did You Get This Number” and “I Was Told There’d Be Cake“; Logan Hill is a journalist who has contributed to The New York Times, New York, GQ, Rolling Stone, Wired and others.



Talking ‘Mad Men’: A Plot for Dawn

Every Monday morning, Sloane Crosley and Logan Hill will be offering their post-”Mad Men” analysis here. Read on and share your reactions to Joan vs. Harry, Don vs. Paggy, and Dawn vs. her dialogue, in the comments:

Sloane Crosley: Well, it looks like things are picking up slightly from last we left off. I wonder if each episode will feature an Attack of the Underdog. First Trudy and now Harry. What did you think of Harry’s Take-Your-25-Thousand-And-Shove-It revolt?

Logan Hill: Yes! Trudy’s rant was my favorite bit last week, and I felt like this week’s episode was an improvement, partly because of Harry’s subplot. Though I worry that Broadway Joe on Broadway will be a catastrophe â€" how could it be otherwise? â€" and Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce will never see that $. I almost hope this is Harry’s swan song.

SC: If Roger has anything to do with it, it will be. All the “Yankee Doodle Dandy” and Notre Dame fight song sing-alongs won’t save Harry or Dow Chemical from Kenny’s beautifully big-eyed assessment that “if he wants people to stop hating him, maybe he should stop dropping napalm on children.” Harry, as a character, is a penny that should be left under the mat. I like, him, I do, but I was never frustrated by his lack of success or gumption as I have been with other characters. Thus I was not rooting for this. I think he’ll get the axe.

LH: It’s funny we agree on this â€" I loathe Harry, but my “Mad Men” plot predictions are always guided by Peggy’s line, “Every time something good happens, something bad happens.” The last guy to land a big account was Lane. And Joan! Congrats on the partnership: Now everyone’s going to call you a prostitute when they disagree with you. What did you make of that?

SC: I thought it lacked oomph. But we have to remember that a pretty significant amount of time (in day-to-day office years) has passed and so I don’t think it’s supposed to have the emotional gravity it had last season when Joan emerges from the bedroom, having already slept with Herb from Jaguar, Don too late to stop it. It’s not even being churned out by the rumor mill anymore. It’s part of the mill itself. So the fact that Joan would feel bad enough to be unable to enjoy herself with Katie seemed off. How Joan got where she is is almost a side note. At this point, she’s been working at the agency for 15 years and she’s the only partner who the secretaries refer to by her first name. That would tick me off.

LH: I was thrilled to get more of Joanie (ahem) but as her pal demonstrates, the reality of her life is much less appealing than the fantasy of it and her perfect image: I saw that theme in the plotline of Dawn, who’s disappointed by Madison Avenue, in SCDP’s fantasy of the Heinz account, and in that way a foursome always sounds more fun until it’s actually proposed across the dinner table. Did you see a parallel between Joan and Megan this week?

SC: Ha. Does it, Logan? Does it always sound more fun? Maybe when Ted McGinley from “Married With Children” is doing the asking. I think there’s always a parallel between the women and Matthew Weiner, the show’s creator, does a marvelous job of showing us how the women on the show have to be just as ingenious and scheming as the men but do it with one hand tied behind their backs. I didn’t see a direct parallel beyond that, but I was more interested in Megan this time around. I like how she’s become a walking symbol of Don’s hypocrisy. Do you find her remotely interesting?

LH: Skipping your first question! I actually think Megan’s a wonderful character â€" a fun, smart woman caught up in this madness â€" but, yes, I’m worried she’s becoming nothing more than a foil for Don. There’s that moment when Don says seeing her make out is “a helluva lot worse than letting my imagination run wild.” You think: Don, your whole career and personal philosophy is built around running away from reality and living in your imagination. Though the prostitution theme (Don’s flashbacks, Joan, Megan) is a little heavy, no?

SC: Well, there’s certainly a deflation rate. “From Dollars to Cents: The ‘Mad Men’ Story.” Megan has become more like his third child. He’s concerned for her but long gone are the days of her scrubbing the white carpet and telling him he doesn’t get to watch. I thought it was a very important moment for their relationship when he follows her into her dressing room. Either they were both going to be aroused or both going to be upset. Obviously it was the later.

LH: Great point: She’s become a person in Don’s mind, and not a fantasy anymore. So the kink is gone. Despite the French maid outfit!

SC: The bangs ruined that outfit for me.

LH: I have no criticism of that outfit. But I did hate the way the show cut directly from Don and Megan to Don picking up the penny and entering Sylvia’s apartment. It felt clumsy. I was on board with that episode until that last scene. It was almost as stiff and on-the-nose as Dawn’s dialogue.

SC: I was just going to bring up Dawn! The bad job she’s doing is not that of “Maid of Honor” but of “Actress”! Though maybe that’s because Mr. Weiner’s handing her some seriously bum dialogue? But yes, to your point, that was my issue with Sylvia as well. Unlike the heavy-handed prostitution theme, her religious conflicts are not prominent enough for her dialogue to carry any weight.

LH: I may file an equal-opportunity suit against Matthew Weiner demanding better lines for Dawn next week. And the line about taking off the crucifix seemed ludicrous, especially coming from Don. And though I really liked this episode until this scene â€" that last line killed me. Really, Sylvia, you’re praying that Don will “find peace” after he leaves? Ugh.

SC: Let’s make it a class-action suit. Pretty sure we can get some of the commenters on board. Anyway, Don is supposed to be all about what you don’t see, right? Like a failed ketchup print ad. Their whole bit was just as transparent and disappointing.

LH: Yes: So let’s wrap up with a few questions for the comment section: Will Broadway Joe’s football musical revue be trouble with a capital TD? Will Joan have her revenge upon Harry? And do readers agree with me that this episode was an improvement upon the first two?

SC: This was the first time we saw Don and Peggy go up against each other for an account. And both of them failed. Was this a warm-up for a more definitive battle down the road? And, of course, the question that’s been at the forefront of our minds: Why does Stan feel the effects of marijuana faster than any human on the planet?

Sloane Crosley is the author of “How Did You Get This Number” and “I Was Told There’d Be Cake“; Logan Hill is a journalist who has contributed to The New York Times, New York, GQ, Rolling Stone, Wired and others.



In Poll, Voters Show Deep Distrust of Albany

After a pair of New York State legislators were charged in unrelated corruption scandals this month, more than 80 percent of voters say they believe that additional lawmakers are likely to be arrested for ethical malfeasance in the near future, according to a poll released Monday.

The poll, by Siena College, found that voters had a high level of suspicion about their state government. Roughly one in three said they believed it was likely that their own state senator could be arrested for corruption, and about the same number of voters believed it was likely that their Assembly member could be arrested. More than half of voters described themselves as distrustful of and cynical about politics in New York, and nearly that number said they had concluded that most state legislators “cannot be trusted.”

“Clearly, the recent arrests have eroded confidence in the Legislature,” said Steven A. Greenberg, a Siena pollster.

The poll was conducted from April 14 to 18, after the arrests of Senator Malcolm A. Smith, a Queens Democrat, and Assemblyman Eric A. Stevenson, a Bronx Democrat, on federal corruption charges in separate cases. Since then, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and lawmakers have vowed to press for new anti-corruption laws before the end of this year’s legislative session.

The poll found that voters were supportive, and even eager, for reform proposals that went beyond what Mr. Cuomo and lawmakers are currently discussing.

A large majority, 82 percent, supported imposing term limits on state legislators so they could not serve more than five two-year terms. And 54 percent supported making the Legislature work on a full-time basis - under such a system, legislators would be forbidden to have second jobs, but would receive a higher salary. Neither of those changes is under serious consideration at the Capitol.

Fifty-five percent of voters said they also supported barring candidates from running for office on multiple party lines. Senator Smith was charged in a scheme to bribe his way onto the ballot for mayor of New York City as a Republican. Mr. Cuomo has proposed ending the requirement that candidates wishing to run on the ballot line of parties in which they are not registered members receive the authorization of party leaders; his proposal would change, but not eliminate, New York’s unusual fusion voting system, under which candidates may run for office with the support of multiple parties.

Voters seemed to disagree with Mr. Cuomo about which law enforcement officials are best suited to ramp up ethics enforcement. The governor has suggested giving more power to district attorneys to prosecute public corruption. But a plurality of voters, 29 percent, said they believed federal prosecutors should take the lead in cleaning up corruption in the Legislature.

Mr. Cuomo has also proposed creating a new office within the State Board of Elections to police violations of state election law. Although he suggested during his campaign for governor giving more authority to the attorney general for ethics enforcement, he no longer supports that idea. In the poll, 27 percent of voters said the attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, should take primary responsibility for battling corruption in the Legislature.

Despite low confidence in the integrity of lawmakers, voters said they were somewhat optimistic that the corruption scandals would prompt action in Albany. About 6 in 10 voters said they were confident that Mr. Cuomo would succeed in winning approval of reform measures aimed at reducing corruption in the state’s political system.

The poll, conducted by telephone of 811 registered voters, has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.



In Poll, Voters Show Deep Distrust of Albany

After a pair of New York State legislators were charged in unrelated corruption scandals this month, more than 80 percent of voters say they believe that additional lawmakers are likely to be arrested for ethical malfeasance in the near future, according to a poll released Monday.

The poll, by Siena College, found that voters had a high level of suspicion about their state government. Roughly one in three said they believed it was likely that their own state senator could be arrested for corruption, and about the same number of voters believed it was likely that their Assembly member could be arrested. More than half of voters described themselves as distrustful of and cynical about politics in New York, and nearly that number said they had concluded that most state legislators “cannot be trusted.”

“Clearly, the recent arrests have eroded confidence in the Legislature,” said Steven A. Greenberg, a Siena pollster.

The poll was conducted from April 14 to 18, after the arrests of Senator Malcolm A. Smith, a Queens Democrat, and Assemblyman Eric A. Stevenson, a Bronx Democrat, on federal corruption charges in separate cases. Since then, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and lawmakers have vowed to press for new anti-corruption laws before the end of this year’s legislative session.

The poll found that voters were supportive, and even eager, for reform proposals that went beyond what Mr. Cuomo and lawmakers are currently discussing.

A large majority, 82 percent, supported imposing term limits on state legislators so they could not serve more than five two-year terms. And 54 percent supported making the Legislature work on a full-time basis - under such a system, legislators would be forbidden to have second jobs, but would receive a higher salary. Neither of those changes is under serious consideration at the Capitol.

Fifty-five percent of voters said they also supported barring candidates from running for office on multiple party lines. Senator Smith was charged in a scheme to bribe his way onto the ballot for mayor of New York City as a Republican. Mr. Cuomo has proposed ending the requirement that candidates wishing to run on the ballot line of parties in which they are not registered members receive the authorization of party leaders; his proposal would change, but not eliminate, New York’s unusual fusion voting system, under which candidates may run for office with the support of multiple parties.

Voters seemed to disagree with Mr. Cuomo about which law enforcement officials are best suited to ramp up ethics enforcement. The governor has suggested giving more power to district attorneys to prosecute public corruption. But a plurality of voters, 29 percent, said they believed federal prosecutors should take the lead in cleaning up corruption in the Legislature.

Mr. Cuomo has also proposed creating a new office within the State Board of Elections to police violations of state election law. Although he suggested during his campaign for governor giving more authority to the attorney general for ethics enforcement, he no longer supports that idea. In the poll, 27 percent of voters said the attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, should take primary responsibility for battling corruption in the Legislature.

Despite low confidence in the integrity of lawmakers, voters said they were somewhat optimistic that the corruption scandals would prompt action in Albany. About 6 in 10 voters said they were confident that Mr. Cuomo would succeed in winning approval of reform measures aimed at reducing corruption in the state’s political system.

The poll, conducted by telephone of 811 registered voters, has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.