Total Pageviews

Newswallah: Bharat Edition

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

Jammu and Kashmir: A mob set fire to a police vehicle and beat up three police officers in Srinagar after prayers on Monday during the Muslim celebration of Id al-Fitr, Kashmir Live reported. 

West Bengal: An outbreak of a virulent form of dengue has affected 219 people in Kolkata and adjoining areas in West Bengal, The Jagran Post reported. The disease is spreading fast since its first incidence last month, the report said, leading the government to open special wards at all state-run hospitals.

India and Bangladesh are set to finalize an agreement on smooth movement of traffic and cargo across the border between the two countries, The Times of India reported. More than a dozen new road routes will connect West Bengal, Assam, Mizoram, Meghalaya and Tripura to Dhaka, to “push trade in the region.”

Uttar Pradesh: In Allahabad, transportation officials were ordered to stop the use of cooking gas cylinders to fuel vehicles because of a shortage of the cylinders in the area, Amarujala reported.

Bihar: The state government is demanding more money from India's central government to repair the embankments of rivers in north Bihar, Prabhat Khabar reported. Bihar struggles annually to contain overflowing rivers downstream from Nepal.

Jharkhand: The Central Bureau of Investigation is raiding coal traders in the state, looking for evidence of wrongdoing, Prabhat Khabar reported.

Gujarat: While the Gujarat government has yet to officially announce a drought situation this year, 12 farmers have committed suicide due to crop failure in various parts of the state, Daily News & Analysis reported. Farmers in the interior regions of Gujarat are suffering doubly due to a lack of irrigation facilities, as Narmada canals have not been built in these areas, The Hindustan Times reported.

Maharashtra: Widely criticized for “police inact ion” during the Aug. 11 violence at Azad Maidan in Mumbai, the city's police commissioner, Arup Patnaik, has been replaced by Satyapal Singh. Mr. Singh, who was formerly additional director general of police, state law and order, said he will try to restore people's confidence in the police, Daily News & Analysis reported. Mr. Patnaik has been made director general of police and managing director of Maharashtra State Security.

Kerala: A pipe bomb was detected on a railroad track at Velloor near Kottayam on Thursday, The New Indian Express reported. Although the bomb was defused before it could go off, train traffic was delayed by more than two hours.



India\'s Paralyzed Parliament

By HARI KUMAR

These days, the Indian legislators have settled into a routine: At 11 a.m., members of the upper and lower houses gather at the Parliament House. Immediately, the opposition members walk to the well of the house, shouting, “Nahi chalegi, nahi chalegi” (“will not function, will not function”) and “Manmohan Singh gaddi choro!” (“Manmohan Singh, leave the chair”). The helpless speaker repeatedly tells the members, “Kripya baith jaieye” (“Please sit down”), but no one listens. After few minutes, the session is adjourned.

The country's lawmakers have never been considered industrious, but this week the Parliament was paralyzed as the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party demanded the resignation of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, accusing him of corruption after an audit showed that the government lost 1.85 trillion rupees ($34 billion) in royalties over its sales of coal concessions. Power executives said that most of the losses were largely theoretical because companies have mined coal from just 28 of the 142 leases.

The government has been accused of losing money in a similar fashion, when another review two years ago estimated that it left as much as 1.8 trillion rupees on the table by not auctioning wireless phone licenses in 2008. The audit led to the arrests of government officials and corporate executives and the resignation of the telecommunications minister at the time of the sale.

On Friday, the government avoided additional scrutiny over the wireless spectrum scandal after the Supreme Court dismissed two petitions against P. Chidambaram that had called for an investigation of the finance minister.

The Congress Party, which leads the ruling coalition, has said that the coal audit can be discussed in Parliament and that the prime minister was ready to answer all questions.

“Congress's appeal for a debate is a sham as th ey have never respected commitments made in parliamentary debates,” said Prakash Javadekar, a B.J.P. spokesman, at a news conference on Thursday.

The ruling coalition fired back with its own press conference on Friday. “We are disappointed that opposition, mainly B.J.P., is not willing to discuss the matter on the floor of the house,” said Mr. Chidambaram.

He also dismissed the audit's findings, saying, “If the coal is not mined, where is the loss?”

The opposition defended its refusal to work. “We are entitled to parliamentary obstructionism as part of our parliamentary tactic,” Arun Jaitley, a B.J.P. leader in the upper house of Parliament, told Times Now, an independent news channel, on Wednesday.

Meanwhile, legislative bills are piling up, waiting for action. During the monsoon session, which began Aug. 8 and ends Sept. 7, Parliament was supposed to pass several bills related to food security, higher education, combating corruption an d land acquisitions, among other pressing topics. But so far the Lok Sabha, the lower house, has yet to pass a single bill, even though 24 were introduced on Aug. 9.

In total, the lower house is sitting on 57 bills this year, according to the Lok Sabha's Web site.

An editorial in The Indian Express, an independent daily, lamented, “In an already-short session, everyone, including the opposition, loses if valuable time is spent on political grandstanding.”



Moscow Court Finds Kasparov Not Guilty of Illegal Protest During Pussy Riot Trial

By ILYA MOUZYKANTSKII and ROBERT MACKEY

Video posted online by Garry Kasparov, the former chess champion, showed his arrest last week in Moscow while speaking to reporters during the trial of members of the protest band Pussy Riot.

MOSCOW â€" A Moscow judge ruled on Friday that the former chess champion, Garry Kasparov, was not guilty of participating in an unsanctioned political demonstration outside the courthouse where three women in the punk band Pussy Riot were convicted of hooliganism last week and sentenced to two years in prison.

Mr. Kasparov, who has long been active in opposition politics, was arrested while giving interviews to journalists. He was in a crowd that gathered outside the courthouse in anticipation of the guilty verdict against the three women who had staged an anti-Putin stunt inside the Cathedral of Christ the Savior last February.

The acqu ittal was a rare victory for a member of Russia's political opposition. Rarer still were remarks by the judge, Ekaterina Veklich, who said that she did not believe some of the police testimony in the case. “The facts recorded in the police report,” she said bluntly, “do not correspond to reality.”

In an interview in the courtroom following the decision, Mr. Kasparov, 49, seemed stunned, and exhilarated. “It's like Christmas,” he declared jubilantly.

“I'm still speechless,” he added. “But, I think this is quite a symbolic moment which may give hope to many of our activists who have been harassed by the police. The judge - for the first time in many years - refused to take police testimony as an absolute truth.”

Ahead of the hearing, Mr. Kasparov had mined social media sites for photographs and video documenting his arrest.

Using this information, he argued that the police report was inaccurate, pointing to video evidence which showed that he was not chanting “Russia without Putin,” at the time as the police claimed.

He also produced a photograph of the original police report and time-stamped images of the officers dragging him away from reporters to prove that he was, in fact, arrested more than an hour before the time listed in the final police report.

Before the verdict came in, Mr. Kasparov said he was gratified that the judge had accepted the video and photographic evidence submitted in his defense, instead of relying solely on the police report. He speculated that the authorities were perhaps mindful of the fact that his arrest “had huge publicity, thanks to all the social networks and journalists,” who were present at the time.

After he was acquitted, the former chess champion said that the judge's ruling offered some hope for opposition activists charged with illegal assembly. Previously, Mr. Kasparov said, “police officers always had immunity to provide false testimonies. Now the judge said, ‘No, they are contradicting each other.'” People who supported me, and, again, the journalists, who were so good in submitting all these video and photos today - I mean, they saved me today!”

Under a toughened law intended to tamp down on unapproved political protests, a guilty verdict against Mr. Kasparov could have resulted in a fine of nearly $1,000.

Despite Mr. Kasparov's optimism, there is no reason to believe his case will change anything for other political op position leaders, several of whom are under investigation or already facing prosecution.

Unlike some of the prominent young leaders of the opposition, like the anti-corruption blogger Aleksei Navalny, Mr. Kasparov is not viewed as posing any serious threat to the government. Then, too, he occupies a very different category in the public imagination than the brash performance artists of Pussy Riot. He is still revered as a national hero by Russians who deeply respect chess skills.

Mr. Kasparov became the youngest world chess champion in history winning the title at age 22 in 1985. He retired from the game in 2005 and since then has been active in politics. He created an advocacy group called the United Civil front, dedicated toward promoting electoral democracy in Russia, and also a political union called The Other Russia, in opposition to President Vladimir V. Putin. In 2007, he briefly ran for president himself.

Immediately after he was cleared on Friday, Mr. Kasparov said that he hoped this ruling would also “help me to demolish the stupid case on biting.” Mr. Kasparov scuffled with police officers at the time of his arrest and has been accused of biting one of the officers on the hand. The alleged biting incident remains under investigation and was not part of the case decided on Friday. Mr. Kasparov, who insists the biting allegation is false, said he intends to sue the police for illegal arrest, assault and slander.

Outside the courtroom, Mr. Kasparov elaborated on the importance of the decision in remarks to reporters, which were translated into English and posted online by The Other Russia.

Mr. Kasparov said:

I have a strange sensation, it's hard to even find words for it, because my lawyers, friends and I didn't expect anything besides another typical guilty verdict. And when, over the course of so many years, all opposition activists have been inevitably convicted in courts like this, it's hard to imagine that the day would come when the courts could provide us with legitimate consideration. Actually, today was very unusual, because from the very beginning, as opposed to many other previous similar cases, the judge agreed to allow motions by the defense. Moreover, all of the defense's motions were accepted, including those that called witnesses to the stand and those that entered video and photographic material as evidence. Of course, this was a very, let's say, unusual sign, but we didn't understand that it would influence the final verdict so much.

I would like to express my particular gratitude to the journalists who managed to collect so many materials, especially photos and video, which were used in the case today and which absolutely had a n influence both on the judge and, perhaps, on the people who have influence on the judge. It was just too obvious. I'd like to thank the journalists who came and appeared as witnesses here today, because it was clear that these people, who were completely different and of completely different nationalities, all said the exact same thing. It seems to me that this left an impression, and it also became obvious that, as opposed to many similar situations, there was no actual case of any sort of event occurring. And the extremely confused testimonies of the two police officers who detained me, which contradicted each other, they of course convinced the judge that their version of events held no credibility.

The result was a full acquittal, and this is a very important step forward. I don't intend to stop here; I want to have charges brought against the officers who illegally detained me. We've already filed the necessary paperwork with the investigative branch for the Kha movniki region. And I hope that this verdict will give us additional evidence so that that my detention and beating will be given due consideration by investigators.

As far as the next case is concerned, the one by Officer Ratnikov about this absurd attack â€" again, I hope that this today's session will allow us to draw upon video and photo materials. We have very unique materials, basically an entire archive that allows us to give practically a second-by-second account of everything that happened outside of the Khamovnichesky Court. Again, my thanks to the journalists who managed to film all of this, to dig it all up from their electronic devices and even now continue to come forward with different photos and video clips. And I hope that the investigators will act just as objectively as this judge did today, and that I'll be so lucky as to have Officer Ratnikov be convicted of libel.

It's hard for me to say what sort of consequences today's verdict is going to have for the Russian opposition on the whole. I even feel slightly guilty, because until now all of these verdicts have been guilty ones, and so many of my friends are still experiencing this pressure. We know that the widespread investigation of the May 6th events on Bolotnaya Square is still ongoing. But nevertheless, this is a very important step forward, and I'm going to do everything in my power to help those who need defense in these matters, because not everyone is so lucky to have their detentions and the police violence they experienced be covered so fully by the press.

Ilya Mouzykantskii is a freelance journalist and a New York Times intern in Moscow. Follow him on Twitter @ilyamuz.



Image of the Day: August 24

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

Fire Meets Its Match: Spices

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

“It's the time of year when the thrill of grilling starts to wane,” John Willoughby and Chris Schlesinger wrote in The New York Times. “Perfectly charred steak enhanced with only salt and pepper, which seemed like nirvana in early June, doesn't necessarily excite in late August.”

“But there's a remedy,” Mr. Willoughby and Mr. Schlesinger wrote, “turn to the cooking of India for a little late-season inspiration.”

Despite the diversity in the cuisines of the subcontinent, there's one factor pretty much universal, “a remarkable dexterity with spices,” they wrote.

Indian cooks don't just add spices to food; they consider how each spice will be used and what characteristic of it should be emphasized. Then they treat the spices in ways that will bring out these traits.

It would take more lifetimes than we have between us to master the intricacies of Indian spice cookery, but that's no reason not to begin. Even the rudiments will create food with vibrant flavors. And, since the distinctive charred, smoky flavor of food cooked over open fire can easily hold its own with spices, there's no better way to quickly liven up your grilled food.

Read the full article.



Fire Meets Its Match: Spices

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

“It's the time of year when the thrill of grilling starts to wane,” John Willoughby and Chris Schlesinger wrote in The New York Times. “Perfectly charred steak enhanced with only salt and pepper, which seemed like nirvana in early June, doesn't necessarily excite in late August.”

“But there's a remedy,” Mr. Willoughby and Mr. Schlesinger wrote, “turn to the cooking of India for a little late-season inspiration.”

Despite the diversity in the cuisines of the subcontinent, there's one factor pretty much universal, “a remarkable dexterity with spices,” they wrote.

Indian cooks don't just add spices to food; they consider how each spice will be used and what characteristic of it should be emphasized. Then they treat the spices in ways that will bring out these traits.

It would take more lifetimes than we have between us to master the intricacies of Indian spice cookery, but that's no reason not to begin. Even the rudiments will create food with vibrant flavors. And, since the distinctive charred, smoky flavor of food cooked over open fire can easily hold its own with spices, there's no better way to quickly liven up your grilled food.

Read the full article.



Outrage in India Over Twitter Crackdown (On Twitter, at Least)

By HEATHER TIMMONS and MALAVIKA VYAWAHARE

The Indian government's recent demand that Twitter block some accounts, including several that parodied Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, has unleashed a storm of mockery and criticism from among the country's millions of Twitter users.

Topics like #GOIBlocks and #Emergency2012 (a reference to the national emergency declared when Indira Gandhi was prime minister which sharply curbed civil liberties) trended on Twitter as users expressed disgust at the move:



or solidarity with the Twitter users whose accounts were targeted:


Some of the user accounts the government requested be blocked, like @Barbarindian and @KachinGupta, have featured acerbic right-wing criticism of left-leaning policies. Others, like @DrYumYumSingh, are parodies of the prime minister's official account, @PMOIndia.

While Twitter users were upset, it is unclear whether any of the named Twitter users were ever blocked. A spokesman for the Ministry of Home Affairs told The New York Times that Twitter had not been cooperative. A Twitter spokeswoman said she had no comment.

The government's demands, details of which were made public Thursday, were part of a larger request that Internet service providers in India block more than 300 items, including videos and blog posts, in response to the recent unrest in Assam.

In response, on Thursday and Friday, some Twitter users in India switched their display pictures to black:

Others used the occasion to criticize the already-under-fire prime minister and the Congress party, which controls the governing coalition:

The party and Mr. Singh have come under a hailstorm of criticism after a series of corruption scandals and missteps. Most recently, an investigation is under way into the allocation of India's coal assets (dubbed “Coalgate”), and the government has been assailed for promoting the power minister on the very day that India experienced the world's largest blackout.

While local media outlets, including The Times of India, warned the government faced a “Twitter backlash,” the real impact of all this online outrage is questionable.

India's upper-class population, the people likeliest to have regular access to the Internet (and therefore to be on Twitter), are also notoriously absent at the polls, as data from recent Mumbai and Delhi elections illustrate.

There's few signs that the attempted crackdown could morph into India's equivalent of the Tahir Square protests. One user who was targeted decided to block himself, saying he was taking a break from Twitter for several weeks:



Indian Government Defends Social Media Crackdown

By GARDINER HARRIS and MALAVIKA VYAWAHARE

While critics have railed against the Indian government's recent demands that Internet service providers block hundreds of pages and sites, current and former government officials say the action is necessary to maintain the peace.

The government demands, which come on the heels of unrest in India's northeast and riots in Mumbai, have been widely criticized as arbitrary and puzzling. Some of the pages the government has sought to block are from general news sites, such as those for the British newspaper The Telegraph and the TV network Al Jazeera. Others were instrumental in debunking false reports of widespread violence against Muslims.

Kuldeep Singh Dhatwalia, a spokesman for India's Home Ministry, defended the recent efforts to crack down on social media in a telephone interview, and said that complaints that the government is engaging in censorship s hould not be believed.

“This decision should not be decided by the person putting out the information,” Mr. Dhatwalia said. “The objection has to come from the other side. Whether it's Assam or another situation, the country for which the concerns have been placed has the responsibility to make the complaints.”

The government has sought to remove or block access to about 310 Web pages and sites, Mr. Dhatwalia said. Mr. Dhatwalia said that Internet service providers have been amenable to the government's request, with the exception of Twitter, the micro-blogging Web Site.

“With regard to Twitter, they were asked to remove certain pages,” he said. “There have been certain inquiries. Those inquiries are being addressed.”

While the discussion between the government and Twitter continues, Mr. Dhatwalia expressed confidence that the issue would be resolved amicably.

“They have expressed certain technical difficulties in finding and r emoving those pages,” Mr. Dhatwalia said. “There is a discussion about this.”

He insisted that India values a free press. “But full freedom cannot be misinterpreted for creating law-and-order security problems,” he said. “What happens is that if certain information through social media is floating around which is objectionable to a certain country, that information is required to be stopped or removed from the public domain.”

Harish Khare, a former media adviser to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, also defended the government's actions in a telephone interview, while insisting that the prime minister himself was probably uncomfortable with such curbs.

“This balancing between freedoms is a problematic area for all governments,” he said by telephone. While the “freedom of individuals is very important, social harmony is very important as well,” he said.

Still, he said, the demands are unlikely to have come from the prime minister's o ffice. “Having worked with him I can say that the prime minister is a liberal to the core, he is not comfortable with such steps curbing individual freedoms,” he said.

Mr. Khare, who was media adviser to the prime minister from June 2009 until January 2012, said that changing technology has put new demands on the government. “When I was the media adviser, we were not so much concerned with social media,” he said. “I cannot say if it has been a boon or a bane but new technology does cut both ways it is a question of finding the right mix.”

Demands from outside the country that India allow unfettered freedom of speech on the Internet are misguided, he said. “If someone sits in Morocco or Boston and says we should have absolute freedom, just to satisfy them we cannot have riots in our country,” he said.



Restrained Chronicler of Tumultuous Times

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

“The Indian photographer Homai Vyarawalla, who died in January at 98, spoke many times, with undiminished regret, of two opportunities missed,” Holland Cotter wrote in The New York Times.

While two crucial moments in India's modern history, the assassination of Mohandas K. Gandhi and the immersion of his ashes in Allahabad, “eluded her” Mr. Cotter wrote, “many, many others did not.” That much is clear from “‘Candid: The Lens and Life of Homai Vyarawalla,' a small, evocative, event-filled retrospective of her work at the Rubin Museum of Art,” he wrote.

The exhibition showcasing the photographer's timeless work, will continue through Jan. 13 next year in New York City.

Of course public history was - still is - primarily staged by men. And the saga preserved in Ms. Vyarawalla's pictures is a cavalcade of patriarchy. It begins with Gandhi - called “ Bapu,” “father,” by his devotees - and continues with Nehru and Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan. Lined up behind them is a string of more- and less-calculating visitors: Dwight D. Eisenhower, the first American president to set foot in India; Ho Chi Minh, the president of North Vietnam; Nikita Khrushchev and Leonid Brezhnev of the Soviet Union; the Shah of Iran; and the young Dalai Lama, seen in a short, tense 1956 encounter the with the Chinese prime minister, Zhou Enlai.

All these men were power players, many of them responsible for the snarled and explosive state of global politics then and now. Ms. Vyarawalla views them neutrally. She once said that being dependent for a living on the gigs that came her way, she couldn't afford to have political convictions, to look with a critical eye.

Read the full article.