Total Pageviews

A Conversation With: Conservative Author and Filmmaker Dinesh D\'Souza

By SHIVANI VORA

One of the most controversial figures to emerge from the sea of opinionated commentators during the run-up to the United States presidential election has been the 51 year-old, Mumbai-born Dinesh D'Souza. To say that Mr. D'Souza is a conservative seems almost to understate the point. His 2007 book, for example, “The Enemy at Home: The Cultural Left and its Responsibility for 9/11,” expounds on his theory that the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were largely an angry Muslim response to American liberalism.

Though he's long been visible in the realm of political think tanks, his latest book and his new movie have made him a celebrity. The 2010 book “The Roots of Obama's Rage,” which argues that President Barack Obama is trying to destroy Western powers to fulfill his father's anti-colonial dreams, this year was adapted to become an unlikely film hit, “2016: Obama's America.” Created with the help of Gerald R. Molen, a co -producer of “Schindler's List,” the 90-minute film is now the second-highest-grossing political documentary of all time, behind Michael Moore's “Fahrenheit 911,” despite having been dismissed as a “slick infomercial” with an unengaging narrator and storyteller (Mr. D'Souza).

In addition to writing and filmmaking, Mr. D'Souza, who comes from a Goan Catholic family, is also the president of The King's College in Manhattan, a Christian liberal arts school. He recently spoke to India Ink about the unexpected success of his movie, why Indians in America are such Obama fans and why he thinks that they're actually far more Republican than they realize.

What inspired you to make “2016: Obama's America”?

I remembered that Michael Moore had made “Fahrenheit 911” and unloaded it before the 2004 election, and I thought the conditions weren't so different right now - we have a controversial president and a country that is divided - so I wanted to do a similar thing.

How did you end up working with filmmaker Gerald Molen, who also made “Schindler's List,” on the film?

I was set on having a high-quality documentary because I have seen so many low-quality ones. I wanted it to be beautiful and have that “Out of Africa” richness, and someone suggested that I reach out to Gerald Molen to help me, so I did.

He knew who I was but hadn't read my book, so I gave him a copy, and he agreed to come on board a week later. He felt that whether you agree or disagree with the book, it has an interesting story that should be told. I personally feel that what makes the movie strong is that it is not a policy film - it is a narrative and gives a psychological perspective of Obama: Here is an abandoned kid who went finding his father and who happens to be the president of the United States.

And this is not a “don't vote for Obama” movie. It's meant to be educational on who t he real Obama is.

You've said before that you embraced conservatism when you attended Dartmouth - can you talk more about how that happened?

I met a group of young conservative students who had answers to questions I didn't know were questions, like “What are the books everyone should read in order to be considered an educated person?” or “Isn't it immoral for a private corporation to do charity?” These were things I had never thought about, and as I began to read and think, it dawned on me that I didn't become a conservative. I always was, and was learning the vocabulary to express it. That's when I began writing and speaking and thought I had a unique perspective, being Indian.

You've also said in the past that your conservative principles resonate with the same ideals you were brought up with in India â€" can you please explain how?

I grew up in a middle-class family in Bandra [in Bombay]. My mom was stay-at-home, my dad was an engineer, a nd we were not political. I was raised with values that placed a tremendous emphasis on education, the importance of studying hard, and the idea that if you have talent and work hard, things will work out for you. I was raised Catholic but was not pious, but I didn't think about political issues at all until I was in college.

What were your expectations with the movie? Was its success a surprise?

Filmmaking is new for me, so I had no expectations. I have a good sense of the book market and what it means to have a successful book. I did know that I would get my message out to a wider audience, since the number of people who buy nonfiction books is far less than those who watch movies. The book was a New York Times best seller last week, but that means it sold 100,000 copies. Meanwhile, three million people have seen the film.

I did sense that it might resonate with a wider population when I sat in the back and observed the audience in the single theater we o pened in in Houston. I saw wild emotion. People were weeping and giving the movie a standing ovation. They were the early evangelists for the film, and since those who see the movie seemed to be overwhelmed by it, it's really word of mouth and social media which has helped it go viral.

You had 25 initial investors in the movie, but you weren't one of them. Between two decades of speaking engagements and several best-selling books, you can't be cash-strapped?

I thought to myself that I'm entering a world I don't know. I will contribute what I know, which is the intellectual structure of the movie. I will write it and narrate it, but I don't know how to market it and distribute it, so it made no sense for me as an investor. It was much more logical to me to approach people who are investors and tell them what I am trying to do.

As it happens, one of the initial investors dropped out because of financial issues, so I did eventually end up putting in $150,000. I will make out well from the film and the investors will get a good return as well.

Why do you think the majority of Indian-Americans support Barack Obama?

I think for most Indian-Americans, Obama's appeal is that he is, like many of us, an in-between man. We are American in much of our identity, but at the same time, we come from another culture, so we are trafficking in the same world as him and identify with him.

For most Indians, it is sufficient that Obama is global like them, but my argument with Obama is not that he has a global point of view but that he has the wrong global point of view. India tried the socialist road for 40 years and is now trying the free-market mode. The socialist model was an unmitigated disaster, and the free-market model works better. Obama is a guy who is frozen in the anticolonial model of 50 years ago, which I could have understood if I were living 50 years ago. It made sense to say things like the rich became rich from l ooting poor countries, but you wouldn't find intelligent people talking that way today in India. He seems to be the most modern of men, and his ideas are backwards. There is the Obama he wants us to see and the Obama of the film.

Do you support Romney, and what do you think he has to do to win over Indian-Americans?

In the film, I don't mention Romney or the Republican National Convention at all, but I will vote for him. However, I do have issues with him. I don't have a clear sense of what his true convictions are. You get the sense that he is tentative and unsure of himself or that he is barraged by consultants who tell him this is how he should be.

The great paradox is that in their actual lives and in the actual values that they espouse and practice, Indian-Americans are to the right of Romney. The Republican Party has three defining elements: they think that this is a dangerous world and America needs to have a tough foreign policy, they want a societ y where people are free to rise on their own merits or not, and they want a free society but also a decent one where open displays of homosexuality, children being born out of wedlock and pornography are limited.

How many Indians think it's okay to have open homosexuality? Very few. How many would like to come home to a pregnant 19-year-old? Very few. And the vast majority of Indian-Americans I know rightly think they rose on their own merits and not through the assistance of the U.S. government.

If Romney looked like Obama, he would sweep the Indian-American vote, but they identify with Obama because he is the underdog and symbolizes making it from outside, just like them.



Momentum Is Slowing in Asia, Report Says

HONG KONG - A diminished forecast from the Asian Development Bank and another weak economic number from China on Wednesday emphasized that the days of double-digit growth in Asia are a thing of the past as global economic turmoil and slowing momentum hobble the region's economies.

Emerging Asia - which includes countries like China, India, Indonesia and Thailand, but not developed Japan - is likely to grow just 6.1 percent in 2012, little more than in 2009, when the world was still reeling from the global financial crisis, the development bank said in its latest economic update for the region. Next year, it said, growth is expected to edge up to 6.7 percent.

Both numbers represented sharp cuts from the bank's previous forecasts, made in April, of 6.9 percent for 2012 and 7.3 percent for 2013, highlighting the deterioration in global conditions this year.

“Growth is slowing down much more rapidly than expected,” the bank's chief economist, Changyong Rhee, said at a news conference in Hong Kong.

Moreover, the slowdown was particularly marked in the region's economic heavyweights, China and India, where growth is expected to reach 7.7 percent and 5.6 percent, respectively, this year.

Again, both figures were well below both the Asian Development Bank's previous projections and the rates of expansion recorded last year; India has been hit especially hard by homegrown issues like the slow pace of change.

China, which depends more on exports than India, has slowed rapidly during the past year, though policy makers appear comfortable with a growth rate of about 7.5 percent, rather than the double-digit jumps in the years before the financial crisis.

Data from the Chinese service sector Wednesday showed expansion at its weakest pace in many months in September: A purchasing managers' index released by the statistics office slumped to 53.7 for the month, from 56.3 in August. Figures higher than 50 indicate expansion.

The service sector accounts for about 40 percent of China's overall growth and about one-third of employment, according to the development bank, and analysts commented that the weak September figure showed that domestic demand, not just exports, was suffering.

“We still see growth in Asia bottoming out” in the third quarter, Klaus Baader, an economist at Société Générale in Hong Kong, wrote in a note, “but the degree of uncertainty has risen.”

The Asian Development Bank stressed that growth in Asia - even at the slower pace it now projects - remained “enviable.”

“There is no need to panic,” said Mr. Rhee, the chief economist, adding that China's wait-and-see approach on measures to prop up growth appeared to be “the right approach right now.”

Analysts have long argued that China and other emerging economies must focus more on the quality rather than the pure speed of expansion, reduce their economies' reliance on exports and manufacturing for growth and shift the focus toward fostering domestic demand, improving productivity and encouraging the services sector.

The service sector in the region is already much larger than widely believed, Mr. Rhee said, but poor infrastructure and a lack of qualified staff hamper development, while poorly designed and inconsistently executed regulations often stifle the business environment .

“A slew of regulations restrict competition and hamper development of the services sector, affecting everything from the corner shop to mobile telephones,” Mr. Rhee said. “These barriers need to be dismantled.”



Video Offers Glimpses of Tehran Protests

By ROBERT MACKEY
Video, said to have been recorded on Wednesday, shows protesters marching past the Bank Melli building across from Tehran's Grand Bazaar.

As my colleague Thomas Erdbrink reports, shopkeepers in Tehran's Grand Bazaar closed their doors on Wednesday, after a protest by foreign-currency traders nearby was attacked by the security forces. The protests came as pressure from international sanctions caused a sudden plunge in the value of Iran's currency, the rial, which has in turn played havoc with the buying and selling of foreign currency, angering merchants and the capital's black-market money-changers, who work along Ferdowsi Avenue in central Tehran.

Iranian journalists working from outside the country shared video and photographs posted online by people who said they witnessed Wednesday's protests in Tehran's commercial center.

A reporter for the BBC's Persian-languag e service, Rana Rahimpour, pointed to video uploaded to YouTube on Wednesday morning, showing protesters marching into the bazaar, chanting: “Dignified merchants, support us, support us.”

Video posted on an Iranian opposition YouTube channel, said to show protesters at the Grand Bazaar in Tehran on Wednesday.

Ms. Rahimpour also directed her Twitter followers to a second video clip, uploaded to an Iranian opposition YouTube channel that collected images of protests in 2009. That video, apparently shot after the protesters entered the bazaar, showed them repeating their call for the merchants to join them by closing their shops.

Video said to show protesters inside Tehran's Grand Bazaar on Wednesday.

Video uploaded later to the same opposition YouTube channel of showed the shutters pulled down on many of the stalls in the bazaar.

Video, said to have been recorded on Wednesday as merchants in Tehran's Grand Bazaar closed their shops in protest.

Saeed Valadbaygi, a journalist and blogger now based in Toronto, posted a link to video of people milling about outside the entrance the bazaar, said to have been recorded after the shopkeepers closed down.

Video showing people milling about outside the Grand Bazaar in Tehran, said to have been recorded on Wednesday.

Mr. Valadbaygi also drew attention to dramatic video (embedded at the very top of this post) showing a large crowd of protesters marching past the distinctive facade of the Bank Melli building in front of the bazaar.

As the Iranian-American sociologist Kevan Harris explains in The Iran Primer, “Iranian bazaars, especially Tehran's Grand Bazaar, have played central roles in the economic and political history of the country.” During the last years of the Shah's rule, Mr. Harris notes, “Bazaaris participated in and supported protests and demonstrations in the spring of 1977, well before most social groups-including the clergy-had joined the revolutionary surge.”

Noting that the merchant class failed to join the wave of protests that followed the disputed presidential election in 2009, Mr. Harris observes:

The absence of bazaari activity during the Green Movement demonstrations of June and July 2009 indicates that broader links between the bazaar as a social entity and democratic social movements in Iran have not developed. This is perhaps because bazaars today seldom exhibit the collective identity and public solidarity that occurred in past moments of Iranian political history. This stems partially from the new cleavages in bazaar networks that resulted from the Islamic Republic's management of the economy and the picking of politically subservient economic winners. However, it also derives from s ignificant changes in relations between the bazaar and the global economy.

Although Iranian opposition bloggers have occasionally misidentified images in the past, pointing to video or photographs shot in the past as if they were new, the images uploaded on Wednesday seemed genuine to journalists who follow Iran closely. One reason is that photographs showed protests and clashes in parts of the capital where even the official media reported demonstrations; another is that some of the video clips included chants against the government's support for Syria, which was not an issue in 2009, when street protests were common.

Golnaz Esfandiari, who edits the blog Persian Letters from Washington, drew attention to video of the protesters chanting “Leave Syria, Think About Us,” a reference to the government's support for the Syrian government despite economic difficulties at home.

Video said to have been recorded in Tehran on Wednesday as protesters chanted: “Let go of Syria, think of us!”

What appears to be more video of that same scene, recorded at about the same time, but from the reverse angle, indicates that the protesters were marching out of Imam Khomeini Square, north of the bazaar, along Ferdowsi Avenue. The large telecommunications building located at the southern end of that square can be seen in the background of both clips, but more clearly in the second one.

Video of protesters marching out of Imam Khomeini Square.

As Reuters reports, the opposition news site Kaleme said the protests began around the bazaar and then spread north to Imam Khomeini Square and Ferdowsi Avenue. The semiofficial Mehr News Agency reports that the security forces dispersed protests on Ferdowsi Avenue and in Imam Khomeini Square.


View Larger Map

Earlier in the day, Bahman Kalbasi, who r eports for the BBC from New York, drew attention to a photograph of protesters posted on Twitter by a blogger named Ali Soltani that appeared to show a march along Manoucheri Street, off Ferdowsi, where the black-market trade in foreign currency proliferates and clashes were reported on Wednesday.

In response to a question from another Twitter user, about a second image he posted online of burning debris behind the marchers, Mr. Soltani wrote that “our house located adjacent to Manouchehri Street, and this photo has been taken by my friend.”



Video: TV Anchor Takes on Viewer Who Complains About Her Weight

By JENNIFER PRESTON
A local television anchor from Wisconsin rebuffs a viewer who had written to her about her weight.

Jennifer Livingston, a local morning anchor in Wisconsin, responded on air directly to a viewer who sent her an e-mail telling her she was an unsuitable role model for young people, especially young girls, because she is overweight.

Ms. Livingston's response, which has gone viral on the Internet with almost 2 million views on YouTube alone, said she had initially dismissed the criticism but then decided to speak up to raise awareness about bullying behavior.

“The truth is I am overweight,” said Ms. Livingston, 37, during the morning broadcast on WKBT-TV, a CBS affiliate in Lacrosse. “You could call me fat and yes, even obese on a doctor's chart. But to the person who wrote me that letter, do you think I don't know that? That your cruel words are pointing out so mething that I don't see?”

“You don't know me,” she continued to say during the next four minutes in what was billed as a broadcast editorial. “You are not a friend of mine. You are not a part of my family, and you have admitted that you don't watch this show so you know nothing about me but what you see on the outside - and I am much more than a number on a scale.”

Ms. Livingston, a mother of three, then used her experience to remind viewers that October is “National Anti- Bullying Month,” and that bullying is rampant on the Internet and growing every day in schools and must be stopped.

She said she tried to laugh off the hurtful attack on her appearance but that her colleagues, especially, her husband, Mike Thompson, an evening anchor for the station, could not do the same.

Last Friday, Mr. Thompson posted the contents of the e-mail on his Facebook page, adding that he was infuriated by the attack on his w ife and it had made him “sick to his stomach.”

The e-mail, written by Kenneth W. Krause, a lawyer, who did not answer multiple telephone calls made to his home in LaCrosse, said:

Hi Jennifer,
It's unusual that I see your morning show, but I did so for a very short time today. I was surprised indeed to witness that your physical condition hasn't improved for many years. Surely you don't consider yourself a suitable example for this community's young people, girls in particular. Obesity is one of the worst choices a person can make and one of the most dangerous habits to maintain. I leave you this note hoping that you'll reconsider your responsibility as a local public personality to present and promote a healthy lifestyle.

The Facebook post prompted hundreds of comments over the weekend from people around the world, with many offering support and others sharing their pain over having been bullied because of their weight.

Ms. Livingston, the sister of Golden-Globe nominated actor, Ron Livingston, said during her broadcast on Tuesday that the outpouring on Facebook inspired her to take a public stand against bullying.

As a grown woman, she said that she was able to dismiss this man's remarks. But she worried that children targeted with similar messages were not able to do so. She said she was also concerned about what children were learning about bullying at home.

“If you are at home and you are talking about the fat news lady, guess what? Your children are probably going to go to school and call someone fat,” Ms. Livingston said.

In closing, she thanked her friends, family, colleague and the many people offered their words of support. “We are better than the bullies that would try to take us down.”:

Then, looking directly into the camera, she said:

“I leave you with this: To all of the children out there who feel lost, who are struggling with your we ight, with the color of your skin, your sexual preference, your disability, even the acne on your face, listen to me right now: Do not let your self-worth be defined by bullies. Learn from my experience - that the cruel words of one are nothing compared to the shouts of many.”

During an interview with NBC's Today Show, Ms. Livingston said that she is not opposed to talking about obesity but she does not think that personal attacks should be part of the conversation.

Mr. Krause was invited to be interviewed on WKBT-TV, a programming director said. Instead, he issued a statement, which was shared on the air. The statement concluded with Mr. Krause saying: “Considering Jennifer Livingston's fortuitous position in the community, I hope she will finally take advantage of a rare and golden opportunity to influence the health and psychological well-being of Coulee region children by transforming herself for all of her viewers to see over the next year.”

< br>

Image of the Day: Oct. 3

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

YouTube and Facebook Remain Blocked in Kashmir

By BETWA SHARMA and PAMPOSH RAINA

The social networking Web sites Facebook and YouTube have been blocked since Friday in India's northern state of Jammu and Kashmir, even though it has been over a week since the last protests against an anti-Islam film.

One telecom company employee, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media, confirmed that Facebook and YouTube were still inaccessible on Wednesday, as did several Kashmiris. The state government had ordered telecom companies late last month to shut down Internet and mobile phone services as it tried to keep Muslims from uploading and downloading the video “Innocence of Muslims,” which has angered Muslims across the world because of its negative portrayal of the Prophet Muhammad.

Government officials insist that the measure quelled the riots and prevented the kind of violence that claimed over 20 li ves in Pakistan.

Since the demonstrations have subsided, Kashmiri Muslims say they suspect that the Jammu and Kashmir government is using the past protests as a justification to routinely block their Internet access. The government, however, denied that it was continuing to bar Internet users from these two social media sites.

“There was never a ban but a suspension,” Aga Ruhullah, Jammu and Kashmir's information technology minister, said Wednesday. The service was suspended on YouTube and Facebook. This was done for the sake of law of order, and that order was revoked on Oct. 1. There must be a snag on the part of service providers because we have revoked the order.”

Some people can access YouTube and Facebook on their mobile phones while Facebook can sometimes be opened on laptops and computers via broadband, but this access comes and goes. The telecom employee said that apps for YouTube or Facebook in new models of phones could bypass his company's firewall and that in any case, an indefinite block was unlikely because the local telecom companies would lose revenue.

Sunil Abraham, executive director at the Center for Internet and Society, a Bangalore-based research and advocacy group, explained that Internet service providers rarely imposed blanket bans because they do not want to “alienate their customer base.”

The Jammu and Kashmir government has increasingly used a communication blackout to prevent unrest in the valley. Even regular mobile phone services were shut down on Sept. 21 between noon and 5 p.m. when it was feared that protests against the anti-Islam film would erupt. Services were restored shortly afterward but were again suspended on Friday.

Kashmiris said that the state government was using the anti-Islam film as a pretext to curb their freedom of speech by restricting access to popular Web sites.

“Personally, I think it's a gag on communication,” said a teenage college s tudent who requested his name not be disclosed because he feared retaliation from the government. “Facebook, Twitter and YouTube have become sources of passing messages and information for separatists.”

Aala Fazili, a 30-year-old postgraduate student, said that Facebook and YouTube allowed Kashmiris to communicate with the world without their words and actions being interpreted by the media. “It is direct and uncut information,” he said. “We speak for ourselves.”

Mr. Ruhullah, however, denied any attempt to crack down on free speech in Kashmir. “We are liberal as before,” he said. “But it is the right of every government to control a bad situation.”

Other college students said they had also heard of people using proxy servers to access the sites. Mr. Abraham of the Center for Internet and Society said that such government bans could be circumvented by using proxy servers or by downloading open-source software like Typhoon and the Onion R outer, or Tor, that helps maintain the anonymity of an online user, as many do in China.

Pranesh Prakash, also from the same center in Bangalore, said that in blocking YouTube and Facebook, the government had once again gone “overboard.” “Lessons have not been learned from what happened in August,” he said, referring to the crackdown on the Internet in aftermath of the Assam riots.

But Kashmiris expressed frustration over the blocking of YouTube and Facebook for reasons other than free speech and activism. Businessmen, for instance, said these two sites had become integral to their branding and communication strategy.

Zulfi, a 24-year-old hotel manager, who requested his last name not be used so he could avoid scrutiny from the government, couldn't access YouTube and Facebook on Wednesday. “It is bad for business as we publicize on both these sites,” he said. “And more and more people reach out to us on Facebook now so I am always checking the messages.”

For many Kashmiris, Facebook is also an inexpensive form of communication with their friends and relatives in India or abroad.

“Forget activism and all - it's just a basic tool to keep in touch,” said Mr. Fazili, the postgraduate student, who hasn't been able to reach his mother in the United States on Facebook or Skype. “This ban has made the entire Internet slow as well,” he added.



In Gujarat, Sonia Gandhi Slams Narendra Modi

By HARESH PANDYA

RAJKOT, Gujarat

Speaking before a rally of about 150,000 people in the scorching heat on Wednesday, the Congress Party president Sonia Gandhi slammed Gujarat's chief minister and accused the opposition of lying to the state's citizens.

Mrs. Gandhi's speech comes as campaigning for state elections heats up in the western state of Gujarat. The state's controversial chief minister Narendra Modi may be the opposition's candidate for prime minister in the next national election, which has also piqued interest in the race.

Though Mrs. Gandhi never mentioned the forthcoming elections in Gujarat during her 15-minute speech, conducted in chaste Hindi, it seemed designed to encourage the Congress Party workers and woo voters.

Mrs. Gandhi began her address by invoking Mohandas K. Gandhi, who was born in Gujarat.

“I bow my head to him,” she began. “It is 169 years since the sun rose from this land and spread luster in the country, in the world, with his light,” she said. “The Congress Party has followed his ideals all these years.”

During her speech, she brushed aside Mr. Modi's oft-repeated claims that he has made Gujarat the most developed state in the country, and criticized his party, the Bharatiya Janata Party, for its attacks on the Congress Party-led United Progressive Alliance, or U.P.A., which runs the central government.

“It is the Congress Party that has laid the foundation of development in Gujarat,” Mrs. Gandhi said.

“No other political party, no individual, has done the kind development work the Congress Party has done in Gujarat,” she said. “But some people, who tend to look negatively at whatever we do, try to take false credit for the development of Gujarat. Why don't they tell people the truth?”

“Gujarat's true development is Congress's vow,” she said, “and this development will be f rom every level, every class of society.” The Congress Party has been inspired by Mahatma Gandhi and the independence leader Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel “to create a new Gujarat,” she said. “And we will definitely create it.”

Congress leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Mr. Patel, among others, played a significant role in the progress of Gujarat, Mrs. Gandhi said. The billion-dollar Narmada dam project was started when the Congress Party was in power in Gujarat, she said, but under the current government it has not fulfilled its potential.

“This project is meant for farmers. But the Narmada waters have not yet reached the farmers of Saurashtra in the last ten years,” she said. She was referring to many dry and arid areas of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat, where people continue to live in drought-like situations because of inadequate rains.

“Poor farmers in Saurashtra have been committing suicide. Fodder is not available to their cattle,” she said, and she called for the current state government to “give a clear picture of the problems faced by the poor farmers, so people can know the truth.”

Mrs. Gandhi also spoke of Gujarat's fishermen, some of whom are regularly captured by Pakistani marines when they stray into foreign territory while fishing in the Arabian Sea. “I have also concern for the fishermen of Gujarat, and our government will definitely look into their problems,” she said.

Blasting the Modi regime for accusing the U.P.A. government of not granting Gujarat the funds due to it, she said: “The central funds given to Gujarat are 50 percent higher than what the B.J.P.-led National Democratic Alliance government had given it. But the state government has kept such facts concealed from the people.”

Speaking of the escalating prices of crude oil and other commodities, Mrs. Gandhi said the nation was going through an economic crisis. While the central government is concerned, s tate governments also need to take measures to curtail prices, she contended. “It is the responsibility of the state governments, too, to take adequate measures,” she said. “Why doesn't the Gujarat government bring the VAT down? Gujarat has the highest VAT rate in the country.”

Mrs. Gandhi also accused the recent government of not doing enough to protect women and minorities. “In Gujarat, when poor Dalits ask for their rights, they are given bullets. Women are not safe here and are subject to all sorts of persecutions,” she said. The statement seemed to be an indirect reference to a recent incident in Thangadh, a town in Rajkot district famous for its ceramics, where three Dalit youths were gunned down by the police. The youths had been pelting stones at the police following a community clash, local news reports said.

Mrs. Gandhi also took the opportunity to castigate the B.J.P. for not allowing the Parliament to run for many days, and accused the opp osition of not doing enough to battle corruption. “The B.J.P.'s views and actions about corruption are both different,” she said. “They did not allow the Lokpal Bill to pass and yet they talk about abolishing corruption. Actually, they are not against Lokpal; they are against Congress.”

“Are they against corruption?” Mrs. Gandhi asked. “I leave it to the people of this country to decide.”

Throughout the speech, she never mentioned Mr. Modi by name. But she did criticize his “so-called achievements.” “Why is the chief minister making so much noise and misguiding the people?” she asked.

Clad in a sari, Mrs. Gandhi arrived in Rajkot straight from New Delhi by a special flight and was given a rousing welcome at the airport by the Congress Party officials of Gujarat. She then visited Kaba Gandhino Delo, where Mohandas Gandhi used to live when he attended the old Alfred High School, in the old city of Rajkot, which has been turned into a M ahatma Gandhi Memorial.

After offering prayers there and spending a few minutes at the memorial, she went to Ramakrishna Mission, where she prostrated herself before the statue of Ramakrishna Paramhans, the spiritual guru of Swami Vivekananda, who raised global awareness of Hinduism. She headed to the venue of her public rally after offering prayers and receiving blessings and prasad, or blessed food, from the monks and planting a tree close to the one planted by her husband, Rajiv Gandhi, during his visit to Ramakrishna Mission in 1980s.

Many observers, including local media, estimated the crowd at 150,000 people, but Congress Party leaders said there were more than 200,000. A large number of people at the rally were from different villages of Rajkot district, and outside the rally venue were rows and rows of trucks and buses that were used to bring a number of those attendants.



Japneet Singh\'s Father Hopes to Prevent Future Accidents

By SRUTHI GOTTIPATI

A little over year ago, I saw a profile picture of a small Sikh child with big, bright eyes in the local paper. Japneet Singh, who was 4 years old at that time, was crushed by the wheel of his school bus.

His death, unfortunately, wasn't unusual. My story in The New York Times on Wednesday notes that India leads the world in traffic fatalities, and that a startling number of them involve schoolchildren. Buses crash, careen down embankments, topple into gorges.

All too often in India, such accidents are shrugged off with a fatalistic attitude.

“People say, ‘It's God's wish.' But it is all our responsibility,” said Arvinder Singh, Japneet's father. Mr. Singh, who plans to create a nonprofit group committed to child safety, wants more accountability - from schools, law enforcement agencies, the government - to help prevent such accidents.

A year after Japneet's death, the family has yet to find closure. Mr. Singh said his family still could not bear to open Japneet's closet and touch his clothes or give away his toys. He said Japneet's mother always thought of him when she cooked chicken â€" the boy's favorite dish. Japneet's brother, Parmeet, who had watched him die, isn't quite sure what happened to him.

“Parmeet looks at the sky to find him,” Mr. Singh said.



Under Pressure, India\'s Entrepreneurs Look for Help From Unusual Corner

By JYOTI PANDE

Despite its bright minds and entrepreneurial spirit, India famously has not  been able to produce global technology start-ups on the scale of a Google, Apple or Facebook, thanks in large part to the country's challenging business environment.

Now Indian entrepreneurs are pushing for an unexpected solution to the problem: government involvement. India's start-up industry, which has historically shunned government oversight, and thrived without it, is now asking the government for support, in the form of a national policy on entrepreneurs.

That was the message this weekend as 1,100 delegates met in Delhi for TiEcon, the annual conference of The Indus Entrepreneurs, or TiE.  The group is a global body of entrepreneurs with a connection to India who foster start-ups. India, many attendees agreed, can make a cynic out of the most idealistic and optimistic â€" two qualities that are intrinsic to entrepreneurs.

For small players, the dizzying journey from idea to I.P.O. - through the byzantine corridors of Indian regulations and mounds of paperwork, combined with a demanding market that expects the highest quality at the lowest price - is enough to drive one back into the bland safety of a salaried job, they said.

The problem has become particularly acute, attendees said, because of the global economic slowdown, as well as a proposal in March from the Finance Ministry to tax “angel investments” made by individuals early in a company's life.

“If the tax goes through in the way it has been announced, it will kill entrepreneurship completely,” said Saurabh Srivastava, chairman of the software company CA  Technologies, co-founder of the Indian Angel Network and chairman emeritus of TiE. “There will be no funding for entrepreneurs in the start-up phase, zero,” he said, and therefore nothing for venture capitalists to fund at a later stage. â €œIt will completely wipe out entrepreneurship,” he predicted.

Each of three TiE conferences I have attended since 2010 has been a vibrating enclave of hope and expectancy, fired by the energy and optimism of hundreds of bright, young entrepreneurs trying to do different things â€" or do things differently. But this year, the usual buzz was missing.

As in past years, the conference featured popular inspirational speakers, like Arunima Sinha, a national soccer and volleyball player who was pushed off a train in 2011 and lost her leg but is planning to climb Mount Everest. Other speakers included Ashok Alexander, a former director of the Gates Foundation's India office who now runs Avahan, the largest H.I.V. prevention program in India, and the husband-and-wife team behind the 17,000 ft Foundation, which aims to drive social change by providing opportunities to remote villages in Ladakh's harsh terrain. Among other things it does, 17,000ft digitally maps schools in rural Ladakh, so resources reach children who study in isolated areas.

Despite all this, as well as notable attendees like the Oscar-winning filmmaker Shekhar Kapur and the British high commissioner, Sir James Bevan, the conference was missing its usual excitement and high-energy buzz, which some attributed to the global slowdown.

India's economic growth slowed to a nine-year low of 5.3 percent in the quarter that ended in June, and India's entrepreneurs have not been spared.   Even successful ones remarked on the challenge.

“India is still an incredibly hard place to do business,” said Pramod Bhasin, vice chairman of Genpact, one of the country's largest business processes outsourcing companies, which employs more than a million people in India. Mr. Bhasin is also chairman of TiEcon's organizing committee.

“Things are much better than they were in the past, but it is still very challenging to do business here,” agreed Deep Kalra, found er and chief executive of MakeMyTrip, an online travel company that was listed on the Nasdaq in 2010.

The industry believes a national entrepreneurship policy could be a cure for its woes. Attendees at TiEcon  said they hoped that the government would take its own report on entrepreneurship, which was completed in June, seriously enough to use it as a basis for a new policy.

The report, “Creating a Vibrant Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in India,” was ordered by India's Planning Commission and written by a 16-member panel, including government officials, entrepreneurs and software industry representatives, that was headed by the former revenue secretary Sunil Mitra.

Among other things, it recommends that the central government set up a National Entrepreneurship Mission as a single entity crossing state lines, whose sole focus would be to establish a vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem in India by closing gaps in financing, education, regulatory framework and labor laws.

It certainly isn't the only paper to have been written on this subject â€" the Ahmedabad-based Entrepreneurship Development Institute also has a draft National Entrepreneurship Policy paper - but it is by far the most comprehensive, inclusive and well-written. TiEcon delegates said it  could easily be the foundation for a substantial policy on entrepreneurship.

“The best part is that it already has the blessings of the Planning Commission,” said Mr. Kalra. “The only notable exception that's been left out is crowd-funding,” which is bound to be included later, he said.

Among other things, the Planning Commission report believes that start-ups could help meet the country's future employment needs.  “India needs to create 10-15 million jobs per year for the next decade to provide gainful employment to its young population,” it says.  “Accelerating entrepreneurship and business creation is crucial for such large-scale employment ge neration.”

The report also says that entrepreneurship could generate solutions to  social problems, in areas like education, health care, clean energy and waste management.

In a world which growth has become elusive even for Asian “tigers,” entrepreneurship has become a widely touted path to economic salvation.  Countries like Israel, Canada and Singapore are leading the way with specific policies to make financing and incubating start-ups easier, as well as streamlining laws and removing barriers to entry and exit.

In the United States, despite the election-year controversy over what President Barrack Obama may or may not have said about entrepreneurs, there is a strong belief in innovation-led growth. In his first full day in office, President Obama created the position of “Chief Technology Officer” for his administration. He also held a Presidential Summit on Entrepreneurship in 2010.  Participants at TiEcon said the Indian government's entrepreneurship policy needs similar focus and attention.Classes in entrepreneurship and managing independent businesses are offered at high school levels as electives in some Bay Area schools this summer.

Mr. Srivastava of CA Technologies is confident that the government understands what changes are needed, he said,  especially in light of the report delivered to the Planning Commission. “The government will keep this in mind,” he said. “The intention is not to kill the industry.”

Jyoti Pande is an author and columnist who has covered entrepreneurs from India and Silicon Valley, including producing features for All India Radio in New Delhi, and writing columns for Mint and the Business Standard. She is currently working on her first novel “The Memory of Pai.”



On India\'s Border, a Changing of the Guards

By BARRY BEARAK
#flashHeader{visibility:visible !important;}

Photographer Poulomi Basu said she got the idea after reading a newspaper article in 2009: India for the first time was recruiting women to serve in its Border Security Patrol, training them to police the country's long and dangerous boundary with its archenemy, Pakistan.

“I thought this was something important that needed to be documented,” said Ms. Basu, who was born in India and divides her time now between London and Mumbai.

The merit of the project magnified in her mind as she realized all that her photos might show. Most of the recruits were from impoverished rural areas. If she could observe them not only in training but with their families as well, she would be able to tell the story of their transformation from villagers into soldiers.

“For these women, putting on a uniform was like coming out of their own skin,” Ms. Basu said. “They saw it as a way of gaining some form of independence.”

The Border Security Patrol is a paramilitary force, and while some women joined simply as a way to earn money, others enlisted so they could escape the constraints of patriarchal family life. In India, while women are venerated, they are also expected to remain “passive,” Ms. Basu said.

In fact, some of the recruits were simply replacing duty to family with duty for country. “They often think it's a massive privilege to serve for the nation with almost the same conviction in the way they would serve a man,” she said.

Ms. Basu believed her photos could evoke powerful themes: youth, gender, love, patriotism, the concept of home, the stress of new undertakings.

India already had a small number of women in its armed forces but these recruits were being asked to become sentinels in the hard and dangerous terrain between two nuclear-armed nations that have fought three all-out wars and several smaller ones.

Since 1947, when British relinquished its colonial hold on the Indian subcontinent and midwifed the synchronized birth of India and Pakistan, the two countries have disputed their imposed borders, most often in the province of Jammu and Kashmir. Both nations tend to believe the other is capable of heinous acts and frequently they are right. Pakistan has long dispatched fighters across the border while also financing Kashmiri insurrectionists; in response, India, according to human rights groups, has killed thousands in extra-judicial murders in its counterinsurgency campaign.

The first of the new female recruits were deployed in September 2009. But Ms. Basu's work had begun three months earlier when she began the difficult task of getting the required government permission.

“Access was a problem,” s he said. “I had to go through a series of people. For a while, it seemed like I was always on the phone, and it made a big difference when I was able to see people face to face. It made my life easier to be a woman and to be an Indian national.”

This was a project Ms. Basu, a freelancer, was doing on her own but the authorities insisted she demonstrate some affiliation with a publication. Through a friend of a friend she was able to secure a letter from Rolling Stone, she said. That finally satisfied the Indian authorities. In 2009, Ms. Basu made three trips to the border areas where the women were training, each lasting three or four days; she made another trip last year.

Photos taken in the early part of the project - the initial training and visits to the women's villages - were shot in color. “This was a time of love and contentment and it was very vivid,” Ms. Basu said.

But then when the women actually began to patrol, she switched to black-and -white. “The border life is really rubbish,” she said. “It's very desolate there and you sit in the camps and nothing happens. Because their lives lacked color, I wanted to have a grainier, intense look.”

One of the most riveting photographs shows a dead man hanging upside down (Slide 14), his legs caught in the high barbed wire fence that India has constructed to demarcate the border. Guards had shot the man as he and others tried to enter Pakistan near Attari, in Punjab State, Ms. Basu said.

She was taken to the spot by the media chaperones of the border patrol. “'Madam, here, see the blood,'” Ms. Basu recalled them saying.

These minders were unsure what she could be allowed to photograph. In the end, however, they not only allowed her to take pictures, they supplied the equipment. Her Nikon F80 had stopped working earlier in the day, she said, and the minders loaned her a Canon point-and-shoot.

“They were actually proud that they had killed these guys, but they were worried about the accusations of human rights violations,” Ms. Basu said. “They told me, ‘This is not what people ever get to see.'”