Total Pageviews

Two States Split Bitterly by One River

BANGALORE - Last Saturday, several political and cultural pressure groups, which have thousands of muscular men on their rolls, enforced a suspension of normal life from dawn to dusk in the southern state of Karnataka.

Their action was a protest against Prime Minister 's order to the state to release about 250,000 liters, or 66,000 gallons, of water per second from the Kaveri River to the neighboring state of Tamil Nadu. Karnataka does not wish to be so generous with precious fresh water and resents that the Indian government is coercing it to be so.

In the Karnataka state capital, Bangalore, most shops and offices remained shut Saturday. Some buses and cars were stoned by protesters. Thousands of people were unable to reach the airport or the train station until after dusk. The luxury hotel Taj West End closed its massive iron gates and requested that its guests not step out. The hotel also planted over its gates a yellow-and-red flag that is Karnataka's cultural symbol. It is a banner that has, in recent times, represented the fellowship of several jingoistic outfits that, while not offering candidates in elections, exert influence over the state's politics.

A 4-year-old girl who stood with her father behind the hotel's gates asked the security guards why the national flag was not on display. “So many different flags these days,” she said.

Waves of menacing men on motorbikes and cars passed in front of the gates, looked with contempt at the expensive hotel and screamed that Karnataka was great and anyone who stood in its way would be vanquished.

Around 5 in the evening, there was a sudden downpour over Bangalore, and it rained like a reprimand. For an hour, it appeared that the water dispute had been solved by a higher authority. Gangs of men who were patrolling the streets to ensure that the shutdown of the city was complete looked a bit sheepish, but many of them soon began to dance in the rain.

Only two of Karnataka's districts, which have received very little rainfall this monsoon season, are affected by the state's sharing of the Kaveri water with Tamil Nadu, but the dispute between the states has been a political issue for more than a century.

The river originates in Karnataka and flows into Tamil Nadu. Karnataka, through a system of dams, is in a position to control how much water will continue into Tamil Nadu. Tamil Nadu believes that even though it is downstream it has as much right to the river as Karnataka. The Indian government has tried to solve the dispute, but has largely failed.

Over the years, the river dispute has turned the two states into bitter foes. The issue has even developed into a battle of cultural supremacy between Tamil, which is spoken in Tamil Nadu, and Kannada, the language spoken by a majority in Karnataka. In the past, Tamil migrants in Bangalore have been attacked. Partisans of Karnataka have gone to the border to throw stones at Tamil Nadu. And every now and then, as is the case this month, the screening of Tamil films is banned in Karnataka.

A few years ago, Tamil and Kannada film stars confronted each other in a border village by staging a death fast. Kannada stars sat in Karnataka territory and lamented Tamil Nadu's demands for more water. Tamil stars sat in their state and demanded more water from the Kaveri. As usually happens with death fasts in India, nobody died.

The river dispute has also influenced the content of Tamil and Kannada films. About a decade ago the film “H2O” was released. A bilingual film, in both Tamil and Kannada, it was a story of two men in love with the same woman. The unambiguous metaphor of the film cast one suitor as Tamil Nadu and the other as Karnataka, and the woman was the river. Her character, not surprisingly, was called Kaveri.

The film boldly tried to educate the people of both the states that politicians were trying to create a rift between the two peaceful populations. There is a scene in which a villain releases gossip into the air, which transmogrifies into many tiny arrows that enter villagers' ears, turning friends who are walking together into sudden foes who start fighting. It was not at all intended to be a funny film.

To a large extent, politicians in both states have ensured that the issue remains alive and simmering and far from resolved. Prakash Belawadi, a filmmaker and journalist who has written extensively about the river dispute, told me: “Politicians cannot and do not want to resolve the issue. The dispute can be solved only by engineers and farmers who have a stake in the river.”

As the dispute escalates, it is a reminder that in contemporary India, where regional political forces are more powerful than ever and even politicians affiliated with national parties do not always respect the notion of a central command, New Delhi's power to resolve tensions between states has steadily diminished.

Manu Joseph is editor of the Indian newsweekly Open and author of the novel “The Illicit Happiness of Other People.”



India Hosts Both U.S. and Iran in Delhi (Again)

By SRUTHI GOTTIPATI

The timing, once again, was fairly awkward.

On Wednesday morning, the Iranian minister of energy Majid Namjoo met with business leaders at a prominent trade group's office in India's capital.

On Wednesday afternoon, senior fellows from the Brookings Institution, which is based in Washington, D.C., spoke at a battery of sessions on the “India-U.S. Strategic Partnership,” including energy security, at the exact same location.

“The only thing in common is the venue,” Rajiv Tyagi, a spokesman for the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, the trade group that held the talks, told India Ink.

The meetings came on the heels of a visit by Timothy F. Geithner, the United States Treasury secretary, who met business executives and Indian leaders, including his counterpart, Finance Minister P. Chidambaram, in New Delhi on Tuesday.

This is not the first time that high-profile Americans and Iranians were in town at the same time. In May, India witnessed a similarly odd diplomatic spectacle in the capital, as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton appeared in Delhi to persuade India to stop importing oil from Iran â€" even as an Iranian trade delegation was here trying to drum up more business.

So far, India has been doing a fine balancing act with both allies. The situation in May “actually provided an illuminating window into the realpolitik of Iranian sanctions and of how the United States and India, as well as China, are all trying to achieve their divergent goals,” Jim Yardley wrote in The New York Times.



Live Updates on the Armstrong Doping Case

By ROBERT MACKEY

The Lede is following the reaction on Wednesday to the release of a 202-page report by the United States Anti-Doping Agency, in support of its decision to strip Lance Armstrong of his seven Tour de France titles for systematic cheating. Readers are encouraged to help The Times annotate the report by scouring the document for new information and posting insights and observations in the comment thread below or directing comments to me on Twitter @RobertMackey.



The Armstrong Doping Report

By ROBERT MACKEY

As my colleague Juliet Macur reports, on Wednesday the United States Anti-Doping Agency sent the governing body of world cycling more than 1000 pages of evidence to support its finding that Lance Armstrong won seven Tour de France titles thanks to “the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program that sport has ever seen.”

The agency also made public a 202-page report summarizing its doping file on Mr. Armstrong, who denies ever using performance-enhancing drugs or blood-doping. Readers are encouraged to help The Times crowd-source the document by pointing to important details and new revelations. (Click the icon at the lower left of the document viewer to read the report in full -screen mode.)


10lede Usada Armstrong (PDF)

10lede Usada Armstrong (Text)



Live Video: House Committee Hearing Investigating Attack in Benghazi

By JENNIFER PRESTON

The House committee hearing investigating the attack last month at the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.,

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform meets on Wednesday as part of its investigation into the attack last month at the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, which killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

As my colleagues Michael S. Schmidt and Eric Schmitt report, the House committee hearing is expected to focus on possible security lapses at the mission; potential intelligence failures in assessing a growing militant threat and whether the Obama administration underestimated the dangers posed by Al Qaeda's franchise in n orthern Africa and other extremist groups in Libya.

Among those expected to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee are two senior State Department officials responsible for embassy security worldwide, a former head of security at the United States Embassy in Tripoli and the former head of an American military team assigned to provide security at the embassy.



Live Video: House Committee Hearing Investigating Attack in Benghazi

By JENNIFER PRESTON

The House committee hearing investigating the attack last month at the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.,

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform meets on Wednesday as part of its investigation into the attack last month at the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, which killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

As my colleagues Michael S. Schmidt and Eric Schmitt report, the House committee hearing is expected to focus on possible security lapses at the mission; potential intelligence failures in assessing a growing militant threat and whether the Obama administration underestimated the dangers posed by Al Qaeda's franchise in n orthern Africa and other extremist groups in Libya.

Among those expected to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee are two senior State Department officials responsible for embassy security worldwide, a former head of security at the United States Embassy in Tripoli and the former head of an American military team assigned to provide security at the embassy.



Image of the Day: Oct. 10

By THE NEW YORK TIMES

A Conversation With: Costume Designer Arjun Bhasin

By SUJATA ASSOMULL SIPPY

Arjun Bhasin, a Mumbai costume designer and part-time New Yorker who is famous for infusing Bollywood films with contemporary fashion through his work on “Dil Chahta Hai” and “Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara,” has a very busy few months ahead of him, with three international films scheduled for release before the end of the year: “The Reluctant Fundamentalist,” “Life of Pi” and “Can a Song Change Your Life?”  India Ink recently spoke with him about transitioning from Bollywood to Hollywood, and about what to expect from the coming films.

Nearly everyone in the Hindi film industry yearns to make this “crossover” from Bollywood to Hollywood. How did you manage to make this move so quietly and so successfully?

I would not say I crossed over. I just do both. I started out in New York when I went to New York University film school. By the time I returned to India I had already worked on one film called “Swimfan.” [This erotic thriller was released in 2002.] To be completely honest, I actually knew nothing and did not really follow Indian cinema when I did my first Bollywood film, “Dil Chahta Hai.”

You seem to have done more international projects than Indian films. Why is this?

I am super-picky, as I give so much time to each film. I love the whole process of filmmaking, so when I take on a project I am on the set for every scene. There are many projects I do not take simply because I do not have the time. Plus, there is so much “parallel” cinema and different types of film happening internationally. Films here take longer to finish, but it is a good time to be back in India as there is now a l ot of different cinema happening here.

When you worked on “Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara” and cast the Hermès Kelly as “Bagwati,” did you know you were about to create a fashion phenomenon?

Zoya Akhtar [the director and screenwriter of the film] had written “Bagwati” as a character. She was a lady, a symbol of poshness, and had to have a feeling of being special. So we had to choose a bag that had these elements, and that is how we finally decided on the Hermès Kelly.

Do you tend to get the more “exotic” and India-centric projects in Hollywood? Both “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” and “Life of Pi” do have an Eastern flavor.

Yes, many India-centric projects do come my way, but that could have more do with the fact that I live here so much. Maybe if I was in New York more I would get more New York-centric films. I have brown skin, so it's natural that I will get films more connected to brown skin. Though my first film “Swimfan” had nothing to do with India, and neither does “Can a Song Change Your Life?”

You have three big films coming up â€" any iconic fashion moments in these films?

“Life of Pi” is very subtle. Ang Lee [the director] is a very gentle filmmaker, and it also has an academic feel. The breadth of the film is huge, as Tabu [the female lead] goes from Paris in the 1950s to Pondicherry in the 1960s, so it has beautiful backdrops and costumes. “The Reluctant Fundamentalist” is interesting as it is a Pakistan-based story being made by an Indian filmmaker [Mira Nair], with an international cast. Kate Hudson is very “fashion” herself, and in this film we have broken away from the Californian blonde stereotype look she has. We have changed everything about her look and transformed her into a cerebral New York girl. I think it will surprise people. “Can a Song Change Your Life?” is the most fashionable, a contemporary film. Its look is a mix of vintage with a street. Keira Knightley [the female lead] is very hip in it. I think this is more of a fashion film.

Your sister Niharika Bhasin Khan is now also a costume designer in India, and recently won a National Award for her work in the film “The Dirty Picture.” How does it feel to have your sibling work in the same field?

It is amazing actually. We have very different ideologies and very different styles. I started out at a very young age, while my sister came into films with experience in other fields. I am more repressed and subtle in my approach while Niharika is wacky and out of the box. There is no conflict, as our styles are so different. We would probably never get approached for the same film!

(The interview has been lightly edited and condensed.)



From India Shining to...India Whining?

By MALAVIKA VYAWAHARE

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh railed Wednesday against a “mindless atmosphere of negativity and pessimism” being created in India over the issue of corruption, which, he said, could “do us no good.”

It's true; Indians are negative, depressed and unhappy lately. Much of the cause, though, might be traced back to the government itself.

Last month, the Pew Research Center released a report highlighting the “deepening economic doubts” within India. Among the major world economies, Indians have suffered the greatest loss of confidence in their country's economic conditions over the past year (2011-12), the report said.

Fewer than half of those surveyed were satisfied with the direc tion in which the country was headed and were happy about current economic conditions. Only 45 percent were hopeful that the economy would improve in the next year. This last indicator has seen a dramatic drop from last year, when 60 percent of people were hopeful of better days ahead.

For the 45 percent who described the condition of the economy as bad, the government was the “leading culprit,” according to the report. Pew attributed this sentiment to “months of government missteps, deadlock in the Indian Parliament and widely exposed incidents of public corruption.”

Meanwhile, a study released last year based on World Health Organization data found that Indians had the most “major depressive episodes” among the nations studied, with  35.9 percent of the population having experienced one during their lifetime, far above neighboring China's 12 percent.

Just this week, the International Monetary Fund pegged India's economic growth this year at below 5 percent, the lowest forecast in about a decade, citing “unusual uncertainty” about the country's future, related in part to sluggish structural reforms.

Sometimes it's hard to believe that just a few years ago, when the economy was growing at more than 8 percent, the term “India Shining” was almost unavoidable.  A favorite of newspaper headline writers, conference organizers, the Bharatiya Janata Party and television channels, the phrase symbolized the optimism and promise felt by a nation unleashed from its slow-growth past.

India Ink readers: How are you feeling about India today?



Prime Minister Singh Says India Is Tackling Corruption

By SRUTHI GOTTIPATI

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said Wednesday morning that India's rapid growth has led to new opportunities for corruption, but he underscored his government's commitment to tackling it.

Mr. Singh, speaking at a televised conference of watchdog agencies, said steps had been taken to directly transfer welfare payments to poor people's bank accounts in order to circumvent corruption in India's distribution system. He also noted that changes are being considered to give more teeth to the national anti-graft law, including a move to introduce corporate failure to prevent bribery as an offense.

Mr. Singh's government has been besieged by corruption scandals in recent years . The last session of Parliament was thwarted by calls from the opposition party for Mr. Singh's resignation over the alleged mishandling of coal concessions, estimated to have cost the treasury $34 billion. That and other scandals have exposed India's brazen crony capitalism and renewed public anger.

Mr. Singh, however, argued Wednesday for “the need to protect honest public servants and keep the morale of the executive intact.”

“The mindless atmosphere of negativity and pessimism that is sought to be created over the issue of corruption can do us no good,” he said.

Mr. Singh, who is credited with having helped liberalized India's markets in the early 1990s, said corruption associated with government monopolies, quotas and permits, before India opened up its economy, had been reduced. But he stressed the need for investigative agencies to bolster their skills and techniques to catch up with newer forms of corruption.

Graft cases in India typi cally drag on for years. India has a Prevention of Corruption Act and a variety of watchdog agencies, but the agencies' effectiveness is often questioned because they answer to politicians. A proposal last year to establish an anti-corruption ombudsman did not pass Parliament.



Prime Minister Singh Says India Is Tackling Corruption

By SRUTHI GOTTIPATI

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said Wednesday morning that India's rapid growth has led to new opportunities for corruption, but he underscored his government's commitment to tackling it.

Mr. Singh, speaking at a televised conference of watchdog agencies, said steps had been taken to directly transfer welfare payments to poor people's bank accounts in order to circumvent corruption in India's distribution system. He also noted that changes are being considered to give more teeth to the national anti-graft law, including a move to introduce corporate failure to prevent bribery as an offense.

Mr. Singh's government has been besieged by corruption scandals in recent years . The last session of Parliament was thwarted by calls from the opposition party for Mr. Singh's resignation over the alleged mishandling of coal concessions, estimated to have cost the treasury $34 billion. That and other scandals have exposed India's brazen crony capitalism and renewed public anger.

Mr. Singh, however, argued Wednesday for “the need to protect honest public servants and keep the morale of the executive intact.”

“The mindless atmosphere of negativity and pessimism that is sought to be created over the issue of corruption can do us no good,” he said.

Mr. Singh, who is credited with having helped liberalized India's markets in the early 1990s, said corruption associated with government monopolies, quotas and permits, before India opened up its economy, had been reduced. But he stressed the need for investigative agencies to bolster their skills and techniques to catch up with newer forms of corruption.

Graft cases in India typi cally drag on for years. India has a Prevention of Corruption Act and a variety of watchdog agencies, but the agencies' effectiveness is often questioned because they answer to politicians. A proposal last year to establish an anti-corruption ombudsman did not pass Parliament.



Did a Ban on Facebook and YouTube Save Lives in Kashmir?

By PAMPOSH RAINA

On Sept. 20, Facebook and YouTube were blocked in the Kashmir Valley by government order after Kashmiris took to the streets to protest the anti-Islamic video “Innocence of Muslims,” a trailer of which had been circulating online.  The ban was officially revoked on Oct.1, but as of last weekend, access to the Web sites had not been fully restored.

State officials said the Kashmir ban was imposed in response to the unrest in neighboring Pakistan over the video, which resulted in more than 20 deaths there.  Protests broke out across the Muslim world over the film, resulting in a number of deaths beyond Pakistan.

In India, though, no one died, and violence in Kashmir was minimal. Officials say they believe that the blackout was the right strategy, but it is raising uncomfortable questions about the control of information in the area.

“We were able to control the fallout of a dangerous situation,” one that “could have been much worse,” Iqbal Khandey, principal secretary of Jammu and Kashmir's Department of Home Affairs, said by telephone.  Despite the protests, he noted, no one was killed and no serious injuries were reported.

The blackout, though, appears to have deepened resentment toward the state government among young Kashmiris.  Some said they were upset about the lack of information provided about the ban â€" just another example, they said, of the government not communicating with them.

“No one told us the logic behind the ban,” said Zuhaib Qureshi, 26, who works for a nongovernment organization in Kashmir. He called it an arbitrary shutdown of social networking and said it did not make sense. “You don't get informed here,” he said.

“The ban is wrong, it shouldn't have been done, and will just create unrest,” said Radha Kumar, director of the Delhi Policy Group think tank, who until last October was one of three interlocutors, or peace negotiators, appointed by the central  government for Jammu and Kashmir State.  It would have been better to “ban the film and get Facebook to disallow discussion of it, while allowing other Facebook activities to continue,” she said.

Ms. Kumar said a Facebook page she created while serving as interlocutor in the state got thousands of comments. People “mostly used it to vent, and the emotions were traumatic,” she said.   

Whether the blackout will be viewed in retrospect as an extreme measure by a panic-stricken government or a prudent move that saved lives, the motives behind it are being debated in Kashmir.

“They are trying to suppress the voices of people in Kashmir,” said Farhana Jan, 23, who recently completed a law degree from Kashmir University. Ms.Jan called the ban unjustifiable, and said that many government officials had publicly denied that there even was such a ban.

As of Oct.10, the official Web site of the state's Department of Home Affairs had yet to post a notice saying that Facebook and YouTube were being restored.  But the original order blocking them was still visible.

S. Mufeed Ahmad, who heads the Media Education Research Center at Kashmir University, said that over the years social media has helped people across the valley, to stay connected.

Nevertheless, he supported the government's decision to block the Web sites. “If they want to maintain peace, maybe they need to take such steps,” Mr. Ahmad said.